You can catch the photons just fine without needing to go absurdly fast. Just put your hand in front of the flashlight beam, and you’ll catch lots of them.
Comment on The speed of light
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
Okay, but what if I go the speed of light minus 1m/s and shine a flashlight, can I catch the photons?
OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 days ago
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Physicists hate this one weird trick
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 days ago
without needing to go absurdly fast
… I would actually argue that for a human catching anything at e-1m/s is deadly.
OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 days ago
You’re already going c-1m/s if compared to the right reference frame.
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 days ago
You are correct, can’t argue with that.
nexguy@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Light ALWAYS travels away from you at the speed of light no matter how fast you and your flashlight are going. Something has to give and that is time. It may look to outside observers, not traveling that fast along with you, that light is going 1 m/s faster than you… but you would also appear to be moving in super slow motion trying to reach out for the beam. The faster you go the slower time moves for you.
not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
no i think the light would indeed just travel 1m/s away for them but it would be very blueshifted, they could never catch it as in catching up to it because they can’t reach the speed of light instead their mass gets more and more
pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Nope. In your frame of reference, they will still be moving at the speed of light.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
I think the answer is that you are only traveling at almost light speed from reference frame of your start position.
The light of the lamp travels at light speed from your own reference speed which to you in a vacuum is 0.
Anyone correct if wrong please?
BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Correct. Physics gets really, really weird at relativistic speeds. Something to keep in mind is that the speed of light isn’t actually the speed of light itself, but rather the speed of causality - the universe’s hard limit at which any interactions can occur. Even if you are traveling at .99c from a certain reference frame, space time itself warps in such a way that your measurements still determine that light travels away from you at 1c
thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Any observations wouldn’t see anything but the whole light
I believe this is explained by Einstein in his example of the train in the Theory of Relativity
airbreather@lemmy.world 3 days ago
You’re already traveling at the speed of light minus 1m/s relative to a reference frame that’s traveling away from you at that speed.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Wow, and I’m in my pyjamas while doing it
ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 2 days ago
No. Ever heard of the doppler effect?
Light behaves like a wave. But instead of hearing sound in a higher/slower pitch relative to the source, you’d be seeing a different color.
merc@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
If you’re going at the speed of light minus 1 m/s and you turn on a flashlight, the beam emitted by the flashlight will be travelling at the speed of light, according to your measurements. Time passes slower the faster you travel.
smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 days ago
No
That’s not a physics statement btw. I just think that you, personally, are too slow to be able to do that. Offense intended.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That may seem harsh to the casual reader, but it’s 100% true in this case.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s a 100% in all cases. The light doesn’t like you and is trying to get away.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 day ago
One day we will all be shrouded in the darkness we’ve created for ourselves.