I refuse to sneeze at work and it drives my manager bonkers.
Comment on Discussion Thread ☂️ Tuesday 2 June 2026
CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 10 hours ago
YL is doing volunteer work at the OP shop so it looks good on her resume. The manager told her that was unusual because usually it’s old ladies who need to fulfil their centrelink obligations or community service. I told her not to sneeze in front of anyone because her sneezes are violent.
She’ll be helping them with their “internet presence”.
*It’s the MS shop so no church affiliation.
SpinMeAround@aussie.zone 7 hours ago
RustyRaven@aussie.zone 6 hours ago
I sneeze in bulk lots with no regard for where or when. Most people who know me have figured out it’s a bad idea to do the whole ‘bless you’ thing because it turns into a major long term commitment.
SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 3 hours ago
I’ll fire off half a dozen, then my nose will start leaking, then it all passes.
tombruzzo@aussie.zone 8 hours ago
She should set the MS shop up with a Depop account and start selling the clothes at second hand fashion prices instead of op shop prices
SpinMeAround@aussie.zone 7 hours ago
IDK, some Op Shop prices are basically second hand fashion prices these days!
tombruzzo@aussie.zone 5 hours ago
I remember an anecdote Adam Spencer said on the radio that instead of taking his clothes to the dry cleaners he would ‘donate’ it to the op shop, let them clean it and put it on the rack for 50c, then go buy it again later. It was cheaper but there was that risk someone would buy your clothes before you.
Now everything is priced at fashion prices and it’s much less viable.
Seagoon_@aussie.zone 5 hours ago
as far as I know they don’t clean the clothes
CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 8 hours ago
That’s a great idea!
tombruzzo@aussie.zone 5 hours ago
You could do an instagram/tiktok showing new things that have come in but that doesn’t actually make you money. Unless you combine that with a CTA at the end saying, “love anything you saw in this video? Buy it on our Depop, but get in now because once it’s gone, it’s gone”
Bottom_racer@aussie.zone 10 hours ago
not to sneeze
Better out than in as they say.
Sneeze away.
CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 10 hours ago
No. She has the loudest sneeze I have ever heard. We don’t want anyone accidentally soiling themselves.
Thornburywitch@aussie.zone 8 hours ago
Any sneeze victims can purchase replacement trousers at the shop. Could be good for business.
CEOofmyhouse56@aussie.zone 7 hours ago
That’s true
Pilk@aussie.zone 10 hours ago
This is, of course, an absolute disgrace
RustyRaven@aussie.zone 10 hours ago
Why?
Pilk@aussie.zone 9 hours ago
My views are from the understanding that these are mostly women who have historically performed the lion’s share of unpaid labor (raising children etc.), worked historically in lower-paid feminised industries and are actively discriminated against by current employers due to their age. That’s lower lifetime earnings and super. They are being forced into volunteer work in exchange for payments that are about 40% below the poverty line.
This may be an extreme subset and I am certain there a women that love the community involvement and purpose.
My critique of mutual obligations goes further but this particular case stands out.
RustyRaven@aussie.zone 8 hours ago
Most of what I’ve seen of people in that age group are using it as an early retirement scheme. I saw a lot of discussion in one of the groups I was in with that cohort actively choosing to leave jobs so they could retire with a combination of welfare payments and using a portion of their Super.
Age/gender discrimination is definitely a problem, but allowing a couple of days of volunteer work instead of having to look for work (and a payment that is higher than younger unemployed people receive) seems a reasonable compromise to bridge the gap until aged pension age.
Alamutjones@aussie.zone 9 hours ago
Because if you’re in a state where you’re relying on centreline you’re often not ABLE to fulfil work obligations.
DSP etc are not benefits that allow for much “work” capacity