Only if they survive until birth.
Comment on Rough time to be a woman. ☕
gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Having 4 babies in 1 year in the 1800s had to be quite the achievement
EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Comment on Rough time to be a woman. ☕
gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Having 4 babies in 1 year in the 1800s had to be quite the achievement
Only if they survive until birth.
tanisnikana@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Not impossible though. Two in January, two in November.
victorz@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Or just the four of them together in one go I guess.
Mac@mander.xyz 1 hour ago
I knew a set of quads in school. They were all really cool.
homes@piefed.world 10 hours ago
Regardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
db2@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
In the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 hours ago
Food was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away.
Plus most of them died before five anyways.
Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Or 6 at once but 2 didn’t make it
pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 hour ago
Or octuplets born on new year’s eve so half were in one year and half were in the next.
victorz@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Now we’re going into bitch territory. 🐕
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Or triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy; capable of anything.
cattywampas@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Irish quadruplets?