bruh it looks like shit lmao
Comment on Nvidia Announces DLSS 5, and it adds... An AI slop filter over your game
username_1@programming.dev 12 hours ago
The right image looks more realistic. Where exactly is the problem? Do you prefer smooth glossy doll-like models? I’m sure this “filter” will be optional.
nfreak@lemmy.ml 12 hours ago
tomiant@piefed.social 7 hours ago
I think a bigger issue is the fact that they override the original artists’ intentions and expressions. It’s like if you painted a painting and AI is like, hey let me just touch up everything for you that I think you fucked up.
It’s not the quality that is the point here, as much as that sucks too.
zaphod@sopuli.xyz 12 hours ago
It looks like it applied some make-up and changed the hair colour.
carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 hours ago
it doesn’t look “more realistic”, it completely changes the character’s appearance: hair that looks dyed, redder, fuller lips, more prominent cheekbones, a more defined chin, and eyes that instead of kinda looking away avoidedly, now stare at your soul through the screen (although that one might be just the lighting, idk)
basically this except more subtle, but the idea is the same, make her look more attractive under the guise of realism. it’s gross on its own, but the implications are even worse imo, just giving gooner chuds the tools to turn any game into the porn of their dreams, fuck art amirite? it’s literally turning everything you see on the computer into slop
tomiant@piefed.social 7 hours ago
If I was an artist that worked on the game and had this shit forced on my product it would make me fucking furious!
Psychodelic@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Yea it looks way better on the right. lol. People just wanna be mad. Just assume they’re bots and ignore the chirping
nfreak@lemmy.ml 12 hours ago
I too have a complete and total disregard for artstyles
AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 11 hours ago
It’s like when people look at a film deliberately animated with a particular framerate, see the version where someone had AI interpolate the frames to make it like 120 FPS, then say it looks objectively better than the original, because the only metric they can value a piece of media by at that point just seems to be “I need more frames”
Like In Into the Spider-Verse, when Miles is animated at 12 FPS, and the (more experienced) Peter Parker is animated at 24 FPS, but after Miles improves and gets a better hold of his skills, he gets animated at 24 FPS, too. The lower framerate subconsciously makes us interpret his movements as more choppy, inexperienced, and imprecise, on top of his existing animated movements, to even better sell the plot point of his inexperience.
Meanwhile, many people’s TVs have motion smoothing, which entirely destroys this effect and makes the film fundamentally less communicative as a result, even if on the surface people just say “It’s smoother so it’s better.”
Psychodelic@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Lmao. I definitely said that.
I too imagine people saying things I disagree with so I can stay upset and disagreeable
nfreak@lemmy.ml 11 hours ago
I mean that’s exactly what you’re saying if you genuinely thing that yassified filtered dogshit with atrocious lighting actually somehow looks better and retains the artists’ intent
Klear@quokk.au 11 hours ago
I’m going to assume they’re confused about which is left and which is right.
IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 12 hours ago
It honestly just looks like color, contrast, and sharpening changes…
I hate ai too but this seems like it’s just blatant anti ai propaganda.
newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
How about the part where they had to use 2 RTX 5090’s to do this? One for the game and one for DLSS 5?
Please try and justify that.
jj4211@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Easy, if it needs that much GPU and even one GPU is hard to find, then it could make someone rent their games from Nvidia to use their GPUs…
Oh. Did you mean justify for the user? Lol, no, only the interests of nvidia matter.
Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I still don’t understand all the extreme anti-ai cult in these types of contexts. Oh well.
Whatever ai did, the right image looks better than the left.
I honestly think the anti ai thing has a lot of crowd mentality aspects to it. There’s reasons to dislike some of what big ai business is doing, more reasons to push for regulation. But this specific example? I got nothin…
jj4211@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
People have repeatedly in this thread talked about how it also added details that were not hinted in the original, and in part it looks like adding makeup, which could totally undermine a character or setting if they are unlikely to care about our have time for makeup.
Characters that have barely survived in the wilderness for weeks somehow wearing lipstick and eyeliner and eyeshadow… That’s the sort of thing that can happen with this approach.
greybeard@feddit.online 10 hours ago
If only Leonardo de Vinci had a camera, can you imagine how much better the Mona Lisa would have been? /s
Noja@sopuli.xyz 12 hours ago
The textures are flat on purpose so the AI filter looks “more detailed” in comparison.
They don’t have to be like this, see this Callisto Protocol 2022 screenshot no weird AI filter needed.
PDFuego@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Definitely. Boot up the game and look at the actual graphics. Their “OFF” pictures look terrible.