Comment on Lol, lmao even.

• pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Reality is the opposite though. GPT5 is expert in a pretty wide amount of trivia. It’s better than the average uneducated person in every subject, but worse than an expert in every subject.

  source

  • SARGE@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    And the average person has (usually) no idea if what they’re being fed is even correct. But as long as it sounds correct to someone who has no idea…

    source

    • FinalRemix@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Plausible bullshit machines.

      source

      • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        That’s my favorite Nine Inch Nails album!

        source
  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    All the AI are wrong at least 1 in 20 tokens, probably more like 3 in 20, to their sample data which is also wrong a considerable amount of the time, so it is an expert in literally nothing and never will be.

    That 1 in 20 number comes from the 2020 paper by OpenAI and the 2022 paper correcting it by Deepmind about AI scaling laws where the AI inverse matching rate would never reach 94% with infnite training and power.

    source

    • MalReynolds@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      GIGO

      source

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        It can also have good in and garbage out, as I mentioned it will never achieve human input accuracy much less superhuman input.

        source
• howrar@lemmy.ca ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Anything else it’s comparable with a random person on the street.

  I’d say we’re actually worse than the average person at everything else. Too much of our brain is allocated to our research.

  source

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It does seem like there’s an inverse correlation of general intelligence/common sense and specialized study.

    source