There was no mutation, or at least there’s no evidence for it. The big change 50.000 years ago likely happened because population density finally became large enough to meaningfully transmit and preserve culture.
Comment on Anon crunches some numbers
rustyfish@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Big AFAIK: The anatomically correct human first appeared roughly 300.000 years ago. In the next 200.000 years they almost certainly genocided all their relatives. After a couple of behavioural changes here and there they had a mutation about 50.000 years ago which changed their brains, improved their communication skills immensely and they finally and truly became what humans are today. But they still wandered around until they finally started growing shit in the ground about 13.000 years ago. But it took about 7.000 additional years for some nerd to start writing roughly 5.000 years ago.
So yeah. The milestones are happening in ever shorter intervals.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
I wouldn’t say genocided per se. We have pretty significant percentages of non-homo sapien DNA. Which implies a decently high degree of inter-breeding.
My money is on a combination of inter-breeding leading to genetic extinction through dilution, resource competition (strained by changing environmental conditions), and of course inter-group conflict.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
There’s good evidence that homo sapiens didn’t invent the shovel. That was technology almost certainly taken from another human species, which suggests a fairly integrated society. You could imagine different species of human all living together, it is certainly behaviour that has been observed in other primates so there is precedent.
DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Damn, imagine the levels of segregation, speciesm and genocide we would see if other human species had thrived and grown like us.
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Extrapolating from this, major milestones would happen faster and faster until 2023, where all remaining major milestones happened simultaneously with thr release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4. For only $200/mo, you can experience this magical moment for yourself with unlimited access to our best ChatGPT models!
lemmyknow@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
@grok draw me an exponential graph
rustyfish@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
✅ spicy
Taalnazi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
fuck grok, by the way, it’s like the grox
jouhija@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
More like gross
As in gross misuse of this planet’s resources
Taalnazi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Oh that too.
For context, the Grox are a species in Spore, the evolution simulator from 2008, made by Maxis (which got bought by EA).
In there, the Grox are an aggressive species, which control a vast empire around the Milky Way’s core, and can only live on T-0 planets. In Spore, planets have a “terraforming score” of T0, T1, T2, up to T3.
A T0 is unlivable and is too hot, cold, humid, or dry, too thick or thing an atmosphere. It has no species.
T1 or T2 is what Earth has in the game. T3 is the “perfect” world. You can terraform a planet to T3 using the Staff of Life, which you get at the Milky Way’s Core.
ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
How long do we have left before we are hitting a milestone per second?
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You forgot the part where we genocided 95% of males after we learned how to grow things.
brisk@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
Source on that mutation? 50 000 years ago humans were already spread across Africa, Asia and Australia. That makes the idea of a critical mutation after that sound implausible
tetris11@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
They genocided each other too.
The skeletal remains that we find of males at dig sites have vast amounts of damage to them, and we find significantly less women and girl skeletal remains. Aeons later and the heterogeneity of the Y chromosome is suspiciously low in contrast to that shown in mtDNA. That’s a lot of killing and raping
LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Wait, I am stupid. Does that mean that many men died, and only few procreated? And assuming the birth rates are the same, why wouldn’t there be women skeletons? After all, everyone dies, whether in a fist fight over who gets to have sex or of cancer at like 70?
tetris11@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Actively bludgeoned by another tribe and then thrown in a pit
They are not killed, but captured and carried away as spoils of war to the conquering tribe
Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
So why aren’t there women skeletons at those conquering tribes? They had to die somewhere.