Well, sometimes I get to read the abstract and the conclusions. And then I get a deserved week off.
Download the Arxiv
Submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://feddit.de/pictrs/image/80637fd5-8f3b-41ac-9203-d6a97aa53060.jpeg
Comments
Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 year ago
weariedfae@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t forget the first thing you do!
Skim the figures.
Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 year ago
True, true.
HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Upper management material
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
I read the summary of the abstract that a journalist with no science degree wrote.
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I read abstract.
This comment has been summarized. The original (15 words) has been reduced by 80%.
If comment was made by a human, and if it was helpful please reply to it with “good human”.
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
“good human”
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Good human
Bademantel@feddit.de 1 year ago
I asked ChatGPT to summarize the article and write my essay about it.
– Thank you
BertieWooster@beehaw.org 1 year ago
I’ve added it to zotero. I’ll read it later when I have time
sid64@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Don’t do this to me.
bleistift2@feddit.de 1 year ago
I skimmed the headline.
bastian_5@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I tried to download the PDF but then I just got errors…
paddirn@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I read a Facebook post
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
So many publications are not worth reading.
Im all in for a revolution of science.
No more bullshitting. No “800 words” required.
If youre able to explain something in 5 sentences and put a table and plot with the results. Do it. No need to elaborate in 5 pages how fucked up your ability is to use thesaurus for synonyms.
Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Agreed. The worst part to write for me are always the fucking "intriduction"s, explain why we did this, why it deserves your attention and a lot of addedd fluff. I did it because I wanted to. Read it if you are interested, go away if not.
Johanno@feddit.de 1 year ago
I had this problem for my bachelor thesis. I used some other paper about machine learning and changed some parameters. Others I didn’t touch because I didn’t knew what they do. Now I have to explain why I copied those parameters. I just wrote in testing they proved to be the best.
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Yes I totally agreee.
jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
5 pages?!??! In my discipline, we spend five pages just kissing reviewer 2’s behind and begging people to take an interest. Then we spend 20 pages citing everyone and their adviser and their adviser’s second cousin on the off chance that they’re married to reviewer 2. Then you get a copy-paste of the documentation of one of the five datasets that everyone uses.
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Ive read about such stories. Must be awful.
Im sorry for you. That really sucks.