Turkish has a different verb tense for something you personally witnessed vs heard second hand or inferred, and I really appreciate that
Anon wants sources
Submitted 3 days ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to greentext@sh.itjust.works
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/90b54361-7e33-4125-88bb-71854620927f.jpeg
Comments
Ellvix@lemmy.world 3 days ago
glimse@lemmy.world 2 days ago
What the fuck, the English stole everything that wasn’t bolted down and they didn’t take THAT with them? PRIORITIES, guys. Skip the French crap and integrate THIS
BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 2 days ago
We can still do it. Time to ask what the turkish word is so we can integrate them into our Frankenstein language
BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Hey for no reason in particular, what is that word?
Ellvix@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Evidential past tense. Depends the verb, but it’s usually verb-miş, which kinda sounds like ‘misha’ or ‘mush’ to my US ears. It’s used when you haven’t personally witnessed something. Like if you go outside and see puddles of water and a cloud that just passed and a rainbow, it clearly just rained but you didn’t TECHNICALLY see it rain, so you say yağmur yağmış instead of yağmur yağdı if you had actually seen it.
So when you find a group of people gossiping, you just hear ‘misha’ ‘misha’ ‘misha’ ‘misha’ because they’re all talking about inferred info, and I’ve heard it called the gossip tense.
And it’s appropriate to note that I know all this second hand. I don’t know any Turkish (besides Dur = stopsign from geoguessr), this is from my language nerd friend who speaks a decent amount, so I probably need to throw a -miş in here somewhere.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 days ago
They said it’s a tense, not a specific word
NeedyPlatter@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
Worse part is when a headline of an article like that is posted on social media and everyone just takes it at face value, especially if they agree with it.
rtxn@lemmy.world 2 days ago
SCIENTIST FOUND EVIDENCE THAT THE MULTIVERSE IS REAL
New experimental observations regarding macroscopic quantum mechanical systems are found to be consistent with the many-worlds interpretation.
bunchberry@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yeah, Many-Worlds is just a bunch of metaphysics tacked on top of quantum mechanics. It doesn’t change any of the mathematics at all, so it predicts all the same things normal quantum mechanics predicts. Yet, for some reason, all the time, you see headlines claiming to find “evidence” for Many Worlds, and you click the article, and you find that all they did was just test a prediction of quantum mechanics is correct… which obviously is consistent with Many Worlds because it makes all the same predictions!
partzel@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Reminds me of every instance of a “Gen Z” is dumb article out there
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Even “sources” are suspicious. I’ve had many discussions where people link their claims and their link says nothing of the sort or outright contradicts them. But they keep on making their claim.
FatVegan@leminal.space 2 days ago
I got sent so many tiktoks or other short form media where someone explains something that they read, and they sound really smart and all. Sometimes i read up the source and what they got out of it was just plain wrong or misinterpreted. Someone once said: smart people aren’t on tiktok, truly smart people don’t have the time, they write the stuff that people make tiktoks about.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Sounds like your friends or family are the issue.
The smartest people write a book and then make tiktok videos about the subject to advertise the book.
reader@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
fake: no source
gay: anon reads
Jolteon@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Found the Vorin.
jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
“It was revealed to me in a dream.”
iocase@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I’m somehow reminded of Philip Roth. Wikipedia’s article on The Human Stain said the book was inspired by Anatole Broyard. Roth said that wasn’t true, and he contacted Wikipedia to fix it. The editors told him he wasn’t a credible source on his own novel and that they needed a published secondary source. So in 2012 he wrote an open letter in The New Yorker setting the record straight, which gave Wikipedia the source it demanded.
MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 2 days ago
My ass is a source.
A source of shit but a source none the less
rtxn@lemmy.world 3 days ago
When the word “tantalizing” is uses, you know you’re in for some absolute hogwash.
Tja@programming.dev 2 days ago
What’s the alternative? Force journalists to reveal their sources? I’m sure that won’t backfire…
LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Or just say more about it
Tja@programming.dev 1 day ago
How much would you need?
Varesti@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
Image