Making Rube Goldberg devices.
If you could use a Rube Goldberg like contraption on any task you find extremely strenuous, what would it be?
Submitted 3 weeks ago by SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
AstroLightz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Turning on/off a light switch that’s a few meters away.
farmgineer@nord.pub 3 weeks ago
Mental health/therapy.
Barring that, weeding my fields
sunsofold@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Isn’t part of the definition of ‘rube Goldberg machine’ the machine does something simple and easy?
Venator@lemmy.nz 2 weeks ago
To rephrase the question: what’s something simple and easy that you’d prefer the task or cost of maintaining and running an overly complex machine than actually doing it?
DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Chopping melons.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Bureaucracy.
magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
Changing fitted sheets
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Also folding them.
TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Cooking meth. (The explosion would be hilarious)
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Sorting and Folding laundry
ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Do people not simply toss the clothes on a pile on top of a dresser? Am I the weird one?
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
That strategy worked well when it was just me and the ~10 articles of clothing I own. But now that I’m in a household of six that approach doesn’t work anymore
Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
I prefer to put away my clothes, but my wife prefers piles.
She can’t stand to spend twenty minutes folding the laundry, so she spends ten minutes every day digging through piles trying to find things. The math doesn’t really check out, but then again laundry is brutal for a lot of people so I get it
Personally, if I leave things in piles I go bonkers and it makes getting dressed every day a big chore. So you do you, but I guess it’s a matter of preference
SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
That takes more effort than taking them out of the dryer, so yes.