A shitpost should both entertain (via shock, absurdity, low-brow humour, etc) but also do so in such a way as to be a waste of time to actually read, time that could have been better spent on just about anything else.
What would you personally consider a shitpost? Basic definition below. Let me know how your definition varies.
Submitted 2 months ago by Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/30511b05-c804-4f39-ba50-27d8a32b0dfb.jpeg
Comments
YoFrodo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
If its deliberately provocative and offensive then its ragebait.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Is that a difference you draw or can they be both?
TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 months ago
I think of them as different.
Shitpost are for laughs. Ragebait is mean spirited.YoFrodo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Ragebait is a type of trolling, shitposting is more in the realm of stupid/silly humor
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I take the Supreme Court’s line on shitposts. They’re hard to define, but I know it when I see it
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Gang shit
RustyNova@lemmy.world 2 months ago
My definition of shitpost is content with a joke that isn’t that good. It doesn’t matter that the media took 3 minutes to makes, or a month, or that it made you laugh for a whole minute, as long as the joke is simple and “stupid” that’s a shitpost.
This is a prime example of a shitpost. Lemmy Shitpost-17344908
The joke isn’t deep. It’s just that it wasted your time.
Another example is this www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CToEldwJdI
Despite being high quality and making me laugh hard when I first heard it, the joke is pretty shallow, thus a shitpost
altphoto@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Its not all about feces. There has to be something else.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Piss
altphoto@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Right, how could we forget! Piss. Truly a remarkable archivement by almost every human alive today.
yesman@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I think the spirit of shitposting is in opposition to the spirit of taxonomy. And it’s super ironic to argue over the definition.
Precisely defining shitpost would annihilate it’s meaning and we’d be forced to use another word.
If you pay attention, you’ll notice that English is actually pretty bad at keeping slippery meanings contained inside her words.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Uh oh big man with big words coming in. Good to get your feedback though considering you’re one of the people I’m talking about not seeming to understand the concept.
FishFace@piefed.social 2 months ago
It should fundamentally be deliberately stupid. It could be offensive, but if so it should be offensive in a stupid way.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Interesting
CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Oh god I haven’t checked my posts yet…
gegil@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Shitpost is a low effort humor.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 2 months ago
This is my understanding too
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s a quick easy definition.
redsand@infosec.pub 2 months ago
Often posted and commented on from a toilet