Hackney pub’s child‑free rule sparks debate online

Comments

• toebert@piefed.social ⁨54⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

  It seems once again parents who don’t supervise their kids ruin it for all other families.

  source
• tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

  This happens every year. Pub announces the rule, people complain, shitrag makes an article about it.

  It’s just marketing at this point.

  source
• givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Lol

  The pub has also decided to ban dogs after 18:00 on Fridays and Saturdays - a move staff say has prompted more pushback than the child‑free policy.

  source
• Flyberius@hexbear.net ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I really don’t think it should be controversial for a drinking establishment to choose to be cold free. Often they aren’t suitable for kids anyway.

  source

  • okwithmydecay@leminal.space ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think it depends on the context, if it was the only pub in a small village, you’d want it to be inclusive as possible. However, in a big city like London, there are lots of pubs, and if one isn’t child-friendly, there’s plenty of others that are, and vice versa.

    source
• tal@lemmy.today ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Heh. Meanwhile, over here:

  calrest.org/…/minors-and-bars-the-basics-one-page…

  No One Under 21

  Section 25665 of the California Alcoholic Beverage Control statute states that minors are not allowed to enter or remain within a bar.

  Patron Must Prove Age

  If the patron can’t prove their age, then they can’t remain in the bar. (B&PC §§ 25658(a), 25658.4, 25659).

  Bar owners wrongfully allowing minors in a public bar with a green license face a penalty of $1000 and/or 6 months in county jail.

  The penalty for the minor wrongfully in the bar is a fine of not less than $200.

  source