The German pride flag is half brown these days
The Danish Pride Flag
Submitted 1 day ago by mech@feddit.org to [deleted]
https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/766501c5-3532-4fb8-a4b2-e73f9caf2dca.jpeg
Comments
v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
mech@feddit.org 23 hours ago
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
If only the SPD got more votes it’d be your national flag
nao@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
nice how everyone is part of it, whether they like it or not
join@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
not many parliaments are a source of pride these days…
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 23 hours ago
If you think this is an effective form of government, you’re insane.
tjr@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
A country with a government that represents the varied opinions of its populus? No I want two shitty parties so that I don’t have to think, and have almost no real choices in elections.
mech@feddit.org 23 hours ago
Yeah, we all know what a dysfunctional government Denmark has, compared to countries with 2-party systems.
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 20 hours ago
Yeah but the US runs on a dysfunctional system by design.
FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 hours ago
Notices user comes from .ml
What’s your ideal type of government ? The one perfect party ?
FarrellPerks@feddit.uk 22 hours ago
Broad coalition governments have proven to be some of the most stable globally, as well as significantly more representative of the nations they represent.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
I’d love to hear your arguments about what specifically make you think it’s ineffective, and why other popular forms of government don’t have that problem
djmikeale@feddit.dk 14 hours ago
Laughing hard in Danish
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
Dictatorships have very effective governments.
mech@feddit.org 21 hours ago
Stable, too. At least until the dictator dies.
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Any political party has a variety of “factions” that have different opinions on different topics. The kind of system you’re seeing here is what happens when these “factions” have a lower bar for splitting out and forming their own party. In practice, this means that instead of having a binary or ternary split in the parliament, you get a smoother transition between the extremes, so it’s much easier to find parties that will collaborate.
If you have only two or three parties, the distance between them will typically be so large that they can’t really collaborate on anything. However, when you have 6-8 parties, you’ll typically be able to find a group of 3-4 parties that are able to form a majority compromise on any given issue. Collaboration becomes more fluid (instead of constant “us vs. them”), compromises become easier, and voters get to express a more nuanced opinion at the polls (not just “left vs. right”, but “I want left-wing tax policies, combined with this specific environmental profile, and these specific stances on education”).
This only becomes dysfunctional if the parties/politicians are unable to collaborate and compromise effectively. However, countries with a parliament like the one you see here will typically foster politicians that are able to collaborate and compromise. You won’t survive as a politician in this kind of parliament if you’re a hardliner that refuses to budge on anything.
exu@feditown.com 23 hours ago
I guess it’s time to stop doing coalitions for the Danish.
Dicska@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Luckily, I have just watched this yesterday to be able to understand it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=co7FsOYSxMo