I’d not have put the clickbait “shocking” in the hed, but regardless, we’re running out of things to take off. Masks, gloves … they want us totally naked, and preferably underage.
Palantir CEO Makes Shocking Confession on Disrupting Democratic Power
Submitted 2 hours ago by remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power
Comments
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 hour ago
Canconda@lemmy.ca 53 minutes ago
Malcolm Ferguson wrote the title for this article not @reminington.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 46 minutes ago
I’m aware. I was referring to the initial editorial judgment by the pub.
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
maybe heads will be next…
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 4 minutes ago
XLE@piefed.social 1 hour ago
I half agree with you and @Mercurial@todon.nl – the “shocking” part is mostly that he would pitch this directly in public, but the “confession” part is more of an offer or a wish
MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
I like the idea that they think that educated jobs only belong to women. That’s an interesting thought.
The sad truth is that this shit isn’t going to replace “highly educated” jobs, and that the AI gravy train will end once people start to enforce basic intellectual property enforcement. Time is ticking, and the market taking a hit now is making them scramble.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 hour ago
Given that copy desks were being gutted more than a decade ago just with little things like Grammarly, it absolutely will replace knowledge jobs. It won’t be better, but it will mean more share buybacks.
GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 1 hour ago
It doesn’t need to be good to replace jobs, as long as there are no consequences for the people making those decisions.
I’ve lost count of how many “oops, it was AI’s fault, not my fault!” stories I’ve heard, even within highly regulated fields. Like, lawyers submitting documents with completely fake citations, and then…no real consequences. Seems to me like that should be cause for immediate disbarment, but no, apparently not.
Mercurial@todon.nl 1 hour ago
@remington he said that AI is going to hurt women and help working class males? This is just rubbish, it’s not a shocking confession. Working class males? I think you’re referring to service production jobs and those are not increasing based on AI. So the CEO is trying to appeal to them by throwing women on a burning cross as usual. If men would stop agreeing to sacrifice women, we would be a much more powerful force of proletariat. And we don’t want AI to be in charge of us
Canconda@lemmy.ca 54 minutes ago
Malcolm Ferguson wrote the title for this article not @reminington.