GenderNeutralBro
@GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
- Comment on TIL Connor Trinneer & Dominic Keating have a podcast called "The D-Con Chamber". Here they are interviewing Nana Visitor on her new book! 1 hour ago:
I never thought about it that way, but yeah. Spot-on.
I don’t hate it in Enterprise to be honest, because there is the context of “humanity not yet at its best”.
- Comment on Whomp-whomp: AI PCs make users less productive 4 hours ago:
In theory, an “AI PC” (please imagine giant eye-rolls along with the scare quotes) has the hardware to run models locally instead of shunting stuff off to OpenAI or Anthropic for processing. So in theory, it’s more private and secure than similar functionality on a “traditional PC”.
In practice…wtf knows what Windows is doing anyway? Or what it will do with the next OS update? Same for macOS. On the Mac side, Apple keeps talking about their local AI and private cloud AI, and yet they’re still partnering with OpenAI for ChatGPT integration. I don’t want to use anything that even has the capability to send my shit to OpenAI, for the same reason I don’t like to put poison in my fridge no matter how clearly labelled it might be.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Wait, isn’t it the other way around? You should arrive in NY earlier than you left London, since NY is 5 hours behind London. So if you leave at 8:30 and arrive 1.5 hours later, it should only be 5AM when you arrive.
You might need a third breakfast before your elevenses in that case.
- Comment on Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model 2 weeks ago:
Interesting read, thanks! I’ll finish it later, but already this bit is quite interesting:
Without access to gender, the ML algorithm over-predicts women to default compared to their true default rate, while the rate for men is accurate. Adding gender to the ML algorithm corrects for this and the gap in prediction accuracy for men and women who default diminishes.
- Comment on Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model 3 weeks ago:
We find that the MTEs are biased, signif-icantly favoring White-associated names in 85.1% of casesand female-associated names in only 11.1% of case
If you’re planning to use LLMs for anything along these lines, you should filter out irrelevant details like names before any evaluation step. Honestly, humans should do the same, but it’s impractical. This is, ironically, something LLMs are very well suited for.
Of course, that doesn’t mean off-the-shelf tools are actually doing that, and there are other potential issues as well, such as biases around cities, schools, or any non-personal info on a resume that might correlate with race/gender/etc.
I think there’s great potential for LLMs to reduce bias compared to humans, but half-assed implementations are currently the norm, so be careful.
- Comment on AI Slop Is Flooding Medium 3 weeks ago:
After all these years, I’m still a little confused about what Forbes is. It used to be a legitimate, even respected magazine. Now it’s a blog site full of self-important randos who escaped from their cages on LinkedIn.
There’s some sort of approval process, but it seems like its primary purpose is to inflate egos.
- Comment on AI Slop Is Flooding Medium 3 weeks ago:
It was an SEO hellhole from the start, so this isn’t surprising.
Do Forbes next!
- Comment on Why 'free' proprietary software will always end in tears 1 month ago:
Yep. If it uses a cloud service, they’re probably going to squeeze you, pull a bait-and-switch, or go out of business. The only exceptions that spring to mind are services with significant monetization in the corporate space, like Dropbox. And I’m not really confident that Dropbox’s free tier will remain viable for long, either.
Even non-cloud-based apps are risky nowadays because apps don’t remain compatible with mobile OSes for very long. They require more frequent updates than freeware/shareware generally did back in the 90s. I remember some freeware apps that I used for 10 years straight, across several major OS versions, starting in the 90s. That just doesn’t happen anymore. I’ve been using Android for over 10 years and I don’t think there’s a single app I used back then that would still work.
Single-purchase apps are basically dead, at least on mobile platforms. Closed-source freeware is dead, too. If it’s open-source, if push comes to shove someone can always pick up the torch and update it. It’s very rare for an open-source project to be completely abandoned without there at least being a viable open-source alternative available.
At this point, I don’t even look at Google Play. It’s F-Droid or bust.
- Comment on Latex programming socks and latex dress 1 month ago:
I…I did not know that. That’s wild.
- Comment on Latex programming socks and latex dress 1 month ago:
Latex is more of a markup language than a programming language.
- Comment on Why wordfreq will not be updated - AI spam 2 months ago:
I’m certain that if someone did collect data from the Fediverse; it would become a hot topic
I’d assume bad actors (or at least chaotic neutral actors) are slurping up the entire fediverse already. It is trivial to do, and nobody would know.
I mean, the whole point is that anyone can spin up a server and federate with others. I could start my own server, which would by default federate with almost all other servers. That means I wouldn’t even need to write a scraper. All that data would be sent straight to my server. All I need is access to my own database at that point. With Lemmy, I’d even get users’ upvote/downvote history, which is not visible in any clients AFAIK. The only barrier would be to subscribe to communities on different servers to kickstart federation.
As long as you don’t run obvious spam/bot accounts, nobody would block your instance.
Alternatively, if you want to write a scraper, that’s also pretty easy. Most servers are publicly accessible. Every community has an RSS feed. You don’t even need an account in general. Again, the whole point is to be open and accessible, in contrast to closed-off data-misers like Facebook, Reddit, and X.
The fediverse is friendly to users, with very little regard for what those users might do. I believe this is the correct philosophy, but I won’t pretend that it doesn’t leave us open to bad behavior.
- Comment on Misinformation: Russian money was funneled to U.S. right-wing creators through a pro-Trump media outlet, prosecutors say 2 months ago:
What part of this is misinformation, exactly? Seems pretty well-supported.
- Comment on In Leak, Facebook Partner Brags About Listening to Your Phone’s Microphone to Serve Ads for Stuff You Mention 2 months ago:
I keep seeing this claim, but never with any independent verification or technical explanation.
What exactly is listening to you? How? When?
Android and iOS both make it visible to the user when an app accesses the microphone, and they require that the user grant microphone permission to the app. It’s not supposed to be possible for apps to surreptitiously record you. This would require exploiting an unpatched security vulnerability and would surely violate the App Store and Play Store policies.
If you can prove this is happening, then please do so. Both Apple and Google have a vested interest in stopping this; they do not want their competitors to have this data, and they would be happy to smack down a clear violation of policy.
- Comment on Was browsing through the Immich cursed knowledge library. This is quite interesting. 2 months ago:
I agree completely.
I understand the motivation here — apps that lack location permission shouldn’t be able to get backdoor access to your location via your camera roll. That makes sense, because you know damn well every
spywaresocial media company would be doing that if they could.But the reverse is also true: apps that legitimately need to read photos and access all their metadata shouldn’t need to be granted full location access.
- Comment on FTC bans fake online reviews, inflated social media influence; rule takes effect in October 2 months ago:
For sure. It’ll never be enforced completely, but it gives teeth to go after some big offenders.
- Comment on 4 things white people can do to start making the fediverse less toxic for Black people (DRAFT!) 3 months ago:
The linked article focuses on Mastodon. I’d be interested to hear more about how this relates to Lemmy in your experience.
- Comment on Proton Now Has a Bitcoin Wallet 3 months ago:
Yes. Homomorphic encryption is for data processing, not data storage.
- Comment on Proton Now Has a Bitcoin Wallet 3 months ago:
Are there any that are cloud-hosted, secure, and private? My experience is limited, but I’ve never found an easy way in. I can’t imagine anyone who’s not tech-savvy getting started without walking through a minefield of scams.
Every now and then I look at options for how I might actually use crypto, and everything looks either outrageously scammy or way too much trouble. Pretty much every exchange I’ve looked at holds the keys to your account, and several have gone under or outright stolen their users’ funds.
The question is, when Proton embraces bitcoin, should it make me trust bitcoin more, or trust Proton less? I don’t know. I’m still skeptical. Their blog post is interesting, but also doesn’t answer a lot of questions. proton.me/blog/proton-wallet-launch
I mean, look at this:
Buy Bitcoin securely in 150+ countries
If you are new to Bitcoin, Proton Wallet also has integrations that make it easy to buy Bitcoin in 150+ countries, and we have also put together a comprehensive Bitcoin guide for newcomers.
That “comprehensive” guide spends three paragraphs talking about the “Blocksize War”, and makes absolutely no mention of how a user can actually buy bitcoin using Proton Wallet. WTF, Proton? Who is your target audience here exactly?
- Comment on Vivaldi: "Many have tagged us in discussions about a specif…" - Vivaldi Social 4 months ago:
It works, though IIRC there are some features that only work in Chrome. I only use it once in a blue moon so I forget the details.
- Comment on We're coming for you 4 months ago:
There are only a few species of mosquitoes that pose a threat to humans (and several thousand that don’t). If we had a way to effectively eradicate those few species, then it probably wouldn’t have major consequences. They don’t fill an important, unique niche in their ecosystems like, say, bees.
But we don’t have a way to do that. Not without huge collateral damage from poisons and the like. There’s been some promising work with genetic engineering, releasing mosquitoes that will mate and produce non-viable offspring. This can greatly reduce a local population in the short-term, but they bounce back.
- Comment on China's state subsidies in green technologies significantly higher than those in EU and OECD countries, distorting competition, researchers say 4 months ago:
Okay. Good for China?
This seems like a really weird way to say “EU countries aren’t investing enough into green tech”.
- Comment on Are you embracing AI? 4 months ago:
For all the talk of regulating AI, I think the only meaningful regulation is very simple: hold the people implementing it accountable.
You want to use AI instead of a real certified professional? Go nuts. Let it write your legal contracts, file your taxes, diagnose your patients. But be prepared to get sued into oblivion when it makes a mistake that real professionals spend years of expensive training learning to avoid. Let the insurance industry do the risk assessment and see how unviable it is to replace human experts when there’s human accountability.
- Comment on Star Trek Is Showing More Love To Scott Bakula’s Enterprise 5 months ago:
How so? Perhaps I’m misremembering, but they were born on Earth and raised among humans, right? Does that not say something about the human culture of their time?
- Comment on Star Trek Is Showing More Love To Scott Bakula’s Enterprise 5 months ago:
It was presented as exceptional in-universe, from Adira’s perspective. The fact that Adira felt weird about it at all paints the culture she grew up in as backwards.
- Comment on Star Trek Is Showing More Love To Scott Bakula’s Enterprise 5 months ago:
The problem I had with that scene (and the whole series, really, especially season 3) was that it framed human culture of the future as being generally oppressive and backwards. Acceptance shouldn’t be portrayed as radical or exceptional. It should be normal and taken for granted among humans in the future. Like in TOS, Uhura’s role was a big deal for viewers specifically because it was not a big deal for the characters. They just showed us a better future, where a black woman in a respected professional position was normal.
Discovery didn’t show us a better future. It showed us a shitty future with a handful of decent people in it. This is just one example, but it’s one that stuck in my mind as well.
- Comment on Dr. Pulaski Appreciation Post 5 months ago:
Pulaski had interesting dynamics with almost every other character. I think she was written very well, especially for such a short tenure. Crusher was largely neglected by the writers.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 months ago:
AI does not mean artificial brain or anything similar. It’s a very broad term that’s been in use for about 70 years now.
Pac Man has AI.
- Comment on Searching for the "most representative" Star Trek episode 6 months ago:
I came here with exactly this episode in mind. I think it is representative in a few ways:
- It involves an alien of the week.
- The alien species is culturally similar to human societies we, as viewers, are familiar with.
- It demonstrates what the Federation is all about, including the Prime Directive, respectfully dealing with less developed civilizations, and solving problems without violence (especially when the problems are your own fault).
- It’s more or less self-contained. Whether this is “representative” is debatable, I guess. I think it’s a big part of Star Trek even though there’s a larger focus on season-long storylines in later series.
- Comment on Men Use Fake Livestream Apps With AI Audiences to Hit on Women 6 months ago:
Everything old is new again. As long as there have been bars, there have been sleezy men lying to impress women in bars.
- Comment on I just heard about Brazilian Butt Lifts which is a procedure where they take fat deposits from somewhere on your body and place it in your butt? 6 months ago:
I have no knowledge of Brazilian Butt Lifts specifically, but here is some related information about how fat works in general, which I hope is a good starting point:
Fat cells don’t die easily. They just shrink. See: news.yale.edu/…/study-new-fat-cells-are-created-q…
When performing skin grafts, fat cells retain the characteristics of the original skin location. For example, here is a paper that shows a soldier who had a skin graft from his stomach to his hand, and later developed a kind of “beer gut” on his hand. Content warning: graphic images of open surgery in related articles section if you scroll down. If you are even a little squeamish, do not scroll down. …lww.com/…/does_transferred_fat_retain_properties…