XLE
@XLE@piefed.social
- Comment on OpenAI finds evidence other AI agents escaped containment as it widens hacking probe 13 hours ago:
“Anthropic is getting all the news cycles about their agents breaching containment*, quick let’s leak some more stories too!” - Sam Altman probably
* there was no containment to breach, the chatbots had full internet access to begin with
- Comment on Anthropic says its own AI models breached three companies during security tests 1 day ago:
How can I give you a billion dollars fast enough?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
I absolutely second this.
Somebody in this thread - among insistence that nobody would ever behave badly in DMs - posted a public call to " expose “ any friends of AdmiralPatrick.
Over sixty people read the message calling a person “cancer” and gave it a thumbs-up. No pushback from the righteous people here.
It’s not lost on me that it’s identical to what AdmiralPatrick did - calling his enemies bigots and probably using it as justification for DDOSing db0. Or that “expose” is the euphemism used by people who do the doxxing to feel less dirty about their behavior.
- Comment on Stop Talking To Me, Google Search 3 days ago:
Not sure if this makes it inherently bad because it’s still not in the US, has a decent privacy policy, and the ads are contextual to your search, not targeted at any identity.
- Comment on Stop Talking To Me, Google Search 3 days ago:
Are websites still protected by Section 230 when the results are editorialized on the fly by an LLM?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Why are you running around to random posts and notifying me about random accusations you’re making at me? I’ve made my criticisms of AdmiralPatrick clear, you’re just trying to do this weird obsessive witch hunt thing @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip . Stop, please.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
I appreciate your goodwill in calling for “exposing” someone when that word means “doxxing” in many contexts, and in saying the 4chan “pizza” call is not relevant. I’m sure people could march up to you holding a swastika screaming “blood and soil” and you’d think they were just a Hindu fan of dirt and medicine.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
You were casually referencing a “pizzagate codeword” that meant… what exactly, @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip ?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
What do you think “cheese pizza” means as you referenced it, @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip ?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
@tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone, the doxxing enthusiast @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip is making the exact kind of barely veiled threats that would be expected. If you think there’s an innocent explanation, you need to be the one to provide it.
Otherwise, for literally no reason, @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip is proving the allegations to be true.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
you ignored my comments on your other posts and instead answered here
The comments that were identical and would have required you to stalk my profile to find them?
you’re effectively running cover for the tesseract dev
I see you priming your doxxing threats to go on the attack against someone who dared question you.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
I’m glad you asked! godsammitdam@lemmy.zip later referenced sending pizza to people who disagreed with him, which is a physical address locating threat as old as 4chan.
If you were asking genuinely, this would bother you.
And if you weren’t…. I’m sure the people looking to paint Lemmy in a bad light would appreciate your inauthenticity.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
They are threats, @godsammitdam@lemmy.zip. The “pizza delivery” doxxing method is over a decade old. That is a threat to expose an address.
What validates this degree of hate in your eyes? What causes you to threaten the livelihood of people who don’t agree with you?
Simply saying I do not believe your extremism should be welcomed here?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
I’m not disappointed by you. I realize hatred will exist in any community of political extremism. I’m disappointed by the lack of people who refuse to acknowledge your open and public threats as threats.
Even as a survival instinct, people who love your hatred should act offended by you, and to pretend you’re a fed and not an authentic member of their group.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
who you’re protecting… we might’ve found another right winger to expose.
As I expected: by questioning your witch hunt, you’ve added me to your list of targets. You’re just replicating Candace Owens in your genuinely deranged vigilantism. As you defend her behavior.
I remember the use of ordering pizza as an explicit method for demonstrating you doxxed people. Seriously, why are you acting like this? Even if you’re the most morally correct leftist on earth, you are also the most gross. Or to put it in a way leftists understand: the most obvious fed, the brightest glowir.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
All you’ve done is make accusations of bigotry without proof, then turn them into a call to action against a person and their “friends”.
If you can be this flippant and disingenuous in public, I can only imagine what people like you are saying in private DMs.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Not only did it happen, but it happened publicly, and over 60 people here gave it the thumbs-up, unfortunately.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
There’s a call to dox people in public right in this thread. 61 upvotes and no pushback as far as I can see.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Sounds to me more like the threats of doxxing that were mentioned.
I don’t agree with the lists in question but this is a huge logic leap followed by calls to harass.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Expose all the bigots friends.
que?
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Can somebody explain who this person is and what they’re complaining about, because all I can gather is db0 is involved
- Comment on It’s Looking Like the Cybertruck Is the Biggest Flop in Automotive History 1 week ago:
We used to have standards for our vehicles
- Comment on Five tech giants are hiding $1.65tn in AI debt, using the trick that toppled Enron 1 week ago:
We had that before AI. Where’s this industrial revolution in concrete terms: specifically without having to say “if” or “when” or pointing out anywhere past a few weeks into the future for it
- Comment on Five tech giants are hiding $1.65tn in AI debt, using the trick that toppled Enron 1 week ago:
What does that first L in LLM stand for?
Large.
You realize math is exactly that right?
A large?
Protein folding is not done with an LLM.
I know you probably felt like a big gotcha cause you tried to move away from the term AI or AGI
No I was using your terms
- Comment on Five tech giants are hiding $1.65tn in AI debt, using the trick that toppled Enron 1 week ago:
Protein folding isn’t LLMs. You forgot to format your motte and bailey fallacy properly.
- Comment on Five tech giants are hiding $1.65tn in AI debt, using the trick that toppled Enron 1 week ago:
It’s literally the next industrial or atomic revolution.
/s?
- Comment on Once Unimaginable, Publishers Are Preparing to Opt Out of Google Search 1 week ago:
You can, in fact, legislate to enact a better status quo. America has a history of civil rights laws that demonstrate as much.
You don’t have to “legislate the world” to make some positive change.
- Comment on Once Unimaginable, Publishers Are Preparing to Opt Out of Google Search 1 week ago:
Google: Muahaha, we train our AI with the data from the publishers’ sites while indexing them. Then we summarize their site so the user never leaves our site and all the ad revenue is ours, brilliant!
Publishers: People aren’t coming to our site from Google search because it just summarizes our site for them. So we lose no traffic by completely blocking Google from crawling us.
Google: Surprised Pikachu face
Source: @leadore@lemmy.world (https://lemmy.world/comment/24710324)
- Comment on Once Unimaginable, Publishers Are Preparing to Opt Out of Google Search 1 week ago:
Google’s zero-click AI search is already harming small publishers! I’m glad we have some common ground on opposing that.
Pushing for regulation against providing AI results would be a great start, which would make the step in this article unnecessary.
