What kind of head leaves you thinking afterwards, "i would pay for that to have not happened. But i'd only pay $4"?
TBH it's a really good deal.
Submitted 1 day ago by MTZ@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d46fa916-e2f7-4d80-8ada-1a081dc579ed.jpeg
Comments
Hegar@fedia.io 1 day ago
i_need_your_bones@piefed.social 11 hours ago
Are you trying to tell me a shrimp is giving this head?
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 day ago
Really good shrimp; forgettable head.
Hegar@fedia.io 1 day ago
What kind of head leaves you thinking afterwards, "i would pay $4 for that to have not happened"?
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 day ago
They bit it off.
altphoto@lemmy.today 17 hours ago
Why is just shrimp more expensive than shrimp and head?
TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 day ago
Waitaminute whys the no head option more expensive?
MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
They have to prepare it rather than just rinse them and throw them in a pot whole.
I prefer the head on, adds more flavor. Also kind of like a crawdads it’s easier to peel with it’s head attached. Pinch, twist, pull.
red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
You, of course, gave the sensible answer. But just in case anyone missed the joke, “head” was implied here to mean “giving head”, aka fellatio being included in the cheaper option.
dumbass@piefed.social 1 day ago
What fucking blowjobs are you getting?
ccunning@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I think it was a joke.
Also, it’s because it takes more shrimp to make a pound of headless shrimp than head-on shrimp.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They really wanna give you that head.
frog@feddit.uk 1 day ago
'cause no backsies