i_need_your_bones
@i_need_your_bones@piefed.social
- Comment on tell me again 1 day ago:
Legit question, what meme?
- Comment on It’s different though 2 days ago:
Just put the wall on the floor. Legit, tiles cured then placed
- Comment on Puff by boring puff 4 days ago:
Ah sorry was meant as a joke from your original comment. Meant no harm, sorry.
- Comment on Would you think more of a President or Leader, if they did something bad, then said yea I screwed up but we are going to fix it, then fixed it? 1 week ago:
I’d think more of a politician whose only done good but I do believe in forgiveness. I’d argue once fixed they’re back to neutral anything past that is positive
- Comment on SBA #245 Sins and Virtues 1 week ago:
Masterpiece
- Comment on Yeah let's blame AI and not developers who can't optimize their stuff 2 weeks ago:
Those computers had to do differentials and other math calculations for small, sole purposes. Alot of the true technology was in the hardware. All the software did was read numbers from the hardware and send a signal to different hardware that then does most of the work. It was a complicated calculator.
A modern application needs to keep track of positiin in the same manner for all items shown, relevant to each camera object, lit by another object at a position, the vector between them all for distance, and then use that to paint a 2d representation of the 3d emulated view which would be seen at a given position from that data, a bunch of flat texture files, and math.
The rocket didn’t need to figure out hundreds of curves it needed to take measurements on fuel usage, air drag, time, gyroscopes, etc. to figure out speed, direction, burn rate, and adjust these things in flight. These are highschool math problems. Definitely a feat to do this all but something one person can write most of the code for.
Modern applications do alot more than those rockets. Just for less useful purposes.
I hate this comparison. Efficiency is a big problem, yes. We should care about it more and accept that we need to start making software slower, and more correct instead of using memory management solutions that obscure it all in a way that allows for every possible solution.
Its a complex problem but no its not comparable to the moon mission. You can’t just go back to assembly, BASIC, and C directly managing memory and expect a 60 hour game to release every 3-5 years. Even with moderate solutions 3-5 years is a short timeframe when you get into the weeds of memory optimization.
- Comment on If I only have space/money for one exercise machine, what should I get? 2 weeks ago:
I like this answer. Good cardio, good for the core. Full body exercise. Rowing machines the best machine imo. Also quite hard to fuck up on or hurt yourself with, in my experiance.
Lots of movement in many joints too.
- Comment on I want to go deep into the earth and be not disturbed by mortal men 3 weeks ago:
I do love so much about it and I doubt I’ll get bored before the game ends. I can absolutely see why it was so popular
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to [deleted] | 11 comments
- Comment on This had to be a terrifying way to go 3 weeks ago:
The snail was humanity all along
- Comment on 3 weeks ago:
I’m ok with advertisements personally. My issue is soley with the tracking. You’re correct that this is how they pay for non paying customers but I’m focused on the morality of that monetization. Staticly inserted advertisments that don’t track you are fine. Like the old newspapers of old which had a simple advertisement placed there that didn’t watch you back. That’s fine.
I’d be much happier if they paywalled the article, or parts of it.
If the free version isn’t viable without immoral monetization it’s unviable. Don’t do it, or find another way to monitize.
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world | 27 comments
- Comment on Big W: Gonna play from Witcher 2 again 5 weeks ago:
Wait I’ve read this a few times and felt jealous. I own that game! Hell yeah, free shit.
- Comment on Day 763 of posting a Daily Screenshot from the games I've been playing 1 month ago:
Oh shit thanks for the info on the ahti control spots that’s very interesting
- Comment on Team Car! 1 month ago:
When they have their own lane and space cars still just use it. They park on the bike lanes, move into them if somebody’s passing on their left, or try and pass cars on their right if they find space during slow traffic.
- Comment on You know who you are 🫶🏻 2 months ago:
Honestly one of me is too many. Bye Bye all!
- Comment on TBH it's a really good deal. 10 months ago:
Are you trying to tell me a shrimp is giving this head?
- Comment on Psychedelic Truth 10 months ago:
Alright I apriciate the effort you’ve given here. I’ll see about educating myself more on your stance. Your continued explination here has been quite helpful in making your stance seem more reasonable than I first thought.
- Comment on Psychedelic Truth 10 months ago:
So your issue in actuality the word “bad”
I think this is detrimental. You can reject the word bad and pretend everything is something good if you handle it right but this is just reductionist and unhelpful.
Even with your examples you speak transformativly. This is a much better framing. Turning something bad into something beneficial. Life and lemons
When you have a bad trip you’re having a bad time. Pretending that it’s impossible for a trip to go bad makes it so when one does your advice is rejected. Framing it as a “challange” puts burden and blame on the individual that is undue. On Shrooms you are not in control pretending you are often is what leads to a bad trip. Acceptance of the mindset, of the trip, is the most common and most effective suggestion one can have for psychedelics. You aren’t in control past set and setting. It’s not your fault if things go south.
Praise be the shroom god allow them to send you as they wish. Go with the water not against it. Float like a log and even though the water is quick you won’t drown.
Bad isn’t a bad word. It’s just a descriptor.
Sure, often (not always) bad can lead to good even great but rejecting the reality of the negative for forced and fictional goodness is delusion. If that trick of the mind helps that’s ok for you but inherently blaming others who recognise bad makes you lesser.
Outside of psychedelics the issue is the same. Blaming, which is exactly what you’re doing, others for the bad positioning it as framing and a failure to realise it’s all actually good bits people with little chance for help to be given.
To go to the absolute, absurd, worst example. A child sa victim. Should they have rejected the idea of bad? What happened to them was good they failed to create? No. Can they make good out of it? Yes. The experiance was still “bad”
- Comment on Psychedelic Truth 10 months ago:
In that case there’s no bad anything. No bad experiances ever. The word bad is meaningless
- Comment on Psychedelic Truth 10 months ago:
Nope. Bad trips exist. I was sat laying down in my bed the entire time crying whiley mind was spiraling down shitty paths that after the trip made zero sense. I was disguested with myself. I couldn’t make myself move. Not locked in but zero motivation. Like that feeling when you need to pee but stay in bed because you don’t want to move.
I tried to cheer myself up think logically about the shit going through my head. It made it much worse. I wanted to die. About three and a half later I finally got out of bed and into the shower to cry. I remembered everything I thought of and that I hatedyself but it all wasn’t true. Completely illogical.
What did I gain from this? Nothing. You can say whatever you want to pretend there’s some underlying massive rebelation or positive that trip should have given me but I reject that whole heartedly. It just made me feel awful for about 5 hours fucked me up for about a week and made me hesitant do mushrooms again.
