The BBC’s response seems to boil down to “we aim to reflect voices in the UK proportionally to current voting intention”.
I don’t think that should be their goal, though. I want them to aggressively hold anyone with, or who wants power, to account. Then, when complaints inevitably come from the right, they could justifiably say “our goal is to aggressively challenge everyone equally”, and point to examples of them holding the other parties to account too.
I think Private Eye is an example of this done well - they look for corruption or hypocrisy, and wherever they can find it, they challenge it.
Was the BBC ever like that? - much more aggressive and towards anyone in power? - or am I just looking back with rose tinted glasses?
anothermember@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Repeat something enough and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. First it was “Jeremy Corbyn is unelectable”, now it’s “Nigel Farage is on course to be the next Prime Minister”. Same thing.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 day ago
Nigel Farage as PM is more of a historical inevitability at this point unless something really big happens, but the media is absolutely complicit.
anothermember@feddit.uk 1 day ago
You’re doing it yourself.
tal@lemmy.today 1 day ago
kagis
Ah. I hadn’t realized that Reform’s polling was nearly that high.
en.wikipedia.org/…/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_U…
Image