By workplace I mean everything that requires labor, I don’t mean just the employees but also the employers
No. Because any advanced civilisation capable of sending a colony ship across light-years to another planet is already so far outside of our current technological ability that it matters precious little.
We would be easy to colonise either way. Doubly so if they have some form of FTL technology to make that trip in reasonable time.
But there’s also an argument that anyone who can do so would have a much easier time not dealing with all of that and just colonising an uninhabited planet, or outright using materials for the task.
Emergency3030@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
No, and yes. Yes it’ll replace a LOT of humans by causing employer to reduce the number of positions available because if a task required 10 humans to get it accomplished with AI it might require only 5 or less people performing that job.
No, it won’t bring or call no advanced civilization since it’s a human invention. It’s smart but it still requires human intervention to keep it relevant. The information it learns and how it learns it is only relevant as us (humans/developers/employers) adjust it to be understandable by us and suitable for our needs or a task. Other than that it’s just a software with a ton of useless information. Someone has to code it so that the information it provides is relevant to accomplish a task/junction. It will always require human error checking. So it’ll still employ humans but less personnel will be required to maintain it.
And YES a lot of people will get laid off (fired from their employments/positions due to AI). Even tho it’s an amazing technology, it’ll kill a lot of people because global hunger is going to get real, unemployed people will disrupt the economies; the business social/community cycle will be disrupted. You need the majority of the population working for an economy to thrive hence the business social cycle.