Where can I find that template?
Equinunerous Sets
Submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/7ade5963-d34d-47be-8a83-8bb6bd3ae652.jpeg
Comments
stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
gigachad@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
degen@midwest.social 2 months ago
Obviously there’s the overall juxtaposition, but I really like the proportional dampness.
django@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Thank you!
gigachad@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
It’s not the same extent and also a jpeg. I’m sorry but I had to go through Instagram photo downloader hell for this
stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Don’t be sorry, I appreciate the effort :)
marcos@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I wouldn’t trust on category theorists discernment. They are patently bad at it.
MBM@lemmings.world 2 months ago
Category theorists 🤝 Topologists
Unable to distinguish 10 donuts from 10 mugs
rain_worl@lemmy.world 2 months ago
consider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.
yesman@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Sure, but does the set of all sets that don’t include themselves include itself?
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Easy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains itself.
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Yesn’t.
match@pawb.social 2 months ago
set a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas
very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2 months ago
But how can set b contain all of the horses if they’re already in set a???
steventhedev@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Gotcha. So all horses are purple?