Equinunerous Sets

Comments

• rain_worl@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  consider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.

  source

  • yesman@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sure, but does the set of all sets that don’t include themselves include itself?

    source

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Easy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains itself.

      source
    • Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yesn’t.

      source
  • match@pawb.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    set a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas

    source
  • very_well_lost@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But how can set b contain all of the horses if they’re already in set a???

    source
  • steventhedev@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Gotcha. So all horses are purple?

    source
• stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Where can I find that template?

  source

  • gigachad@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • degen@midwest.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Obviously there’s the overall juxtaposition, but I really like the proportional dampness.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • django@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    lemmy.world/post/20121817

    source

    • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thank you!

      source
  • gigachad@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It’s not the same extent and also a jpeg. I’m sorry but I had to go through Instagram photo downloader hell for this

    source

    • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Don’t be sorry, I appreciate the effort :)

      source
• marcos@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I wouldn’t trust on category theorists discernment. They are patently bad at it.

  source
• MBM@lemmings.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Category theorists 🤝 Topologists
  Unable to distinguish 10 donuts from 10 mugs

  source