While this graph is speed over time, it would be more beneficial to measure particles over time so that you can also approximate the volume of each fart under each curve.
Scientific Success
Submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/9e020126-3aa6-493e-8c23-9d802a3b5a7f.jpeg
Comments
Lag@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Xenny@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think he graph is simply titled fart speed? The bottom part may measure audibility
loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
How would they measure the number of particles in the first place tho ?
Lag@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They already have the speed measurement, they just need to multiply that by the sphincter diameter.
sevenism@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
Taste test?
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Pooticulomometer.
KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
You follow up with questions on the methodology and data collection, whether they’re additionally factoring in what they’ve eaten and when, are there confounding variables, etc.
unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
The speed of farts is an interesting question. Definitely appreciate any new research.
HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Thanks for saying something because I read it as “Farts Peed” and was concerned.
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
Very curious how they’re measuring speed…
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Reaction time in elevators.
200ok@lemmy.world 1 year ago
BAP = 10
PFOOOOOOOooooooo = 1.5
mombutt_long_and_low@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This belongs in dataisbeautiful.
propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 year ago
So y is speed, but what’s x?
Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 1 year ago
I’m guessing Audio, but no clue.
mathemachristian@hexbear.net 1 year ago
Very close to the brown limit
nickhammes@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d stage a Research Ethics Committee, to make sure their data collection methods don’t have any unforeseen consequences for people who haven’t consented to them