While this graph is speed over time, it would be more beneficial to measure particles over time so that you can also approximate the volume of each fart under each curve.
Scientific Success
Submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/9e020126-3aa6-493e-8c23-9d802a3b5a7f.jpeg
Comments
Lag@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Xenny@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I think he graph is simply titled fart speed? The bottom part may measure audibility
loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
How would they measure the number of particles in the first place tho ?
Lag@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They already have the speed measurement, they just need to multiply that by the sphincter diameter.
sevenism@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Taste test?
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Pooticulomometer.
KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
You follow up with questions on the methodology and data collection, whether they’re additionally factoring in what they’ve eaten and when, are there confounding variables, etc.
unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
The speed of farts is an interesting question. Definitely appreciate any new research.
HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Thanks for saying something because I read it as “Farts Peed” and was concerned.
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Very curious how they’re measuring speed…
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Reaction time in elevators.
200ok@lemmy.world 2 months ago
BAP = 10
PFOOOOOOOooooooo = 1.5
mombutt_long_and_low@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This belongs in dataisbeautiful.
propter_hog@hexbear.net 2 months ago
So y is speed, but what’s x?
Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 2 months ago
I’m guessing Audio, but no clue.
mathemachristian@hexbear.net 2 months ago
Very close to the brown limit
nickhammes@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’d stage a Research Ethics Committee, to make sure their data collection methods don’t have any unforeseen consequences for people who haven’t consented to them