"I'm playing both sides, so that I always come out on top."

Comments

• onion@feddit.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Next week: “Adobe has developed software that can’t be detected by Adobe’s software that detects Adobe’s software”

  source

  • calabast@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Adobe is just two guys who hate each other.

    source

    • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Or one guy working continuously against his own products to produce a net-zero effect

      source
  • wunami@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And that is basically how GANs are trained to generate better and better images or other outputs.

    source
• Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The trick is to then open the image in Gimp and export it.

  source
• CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It can tell cuz pixels

  source

  • Glytch@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And from seeing many shoops in my time.

    source
• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You shouldn’t tell one of the two sides that you’re playing both sides.

  Hang on, let me grab the blood bucket.

  I wish their podcast would resume. There was some funny shit in there.

  If you know, you know. If you don’t, it’s a tv show about a place and the weather.

  source

  • Amanduh@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I stopped watching the podcast when they starred pushing the sponsors hard and also not even talking about episodes anymore =/

    source
• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  but we can already do this, you just apply some specific filters and generally it becomes painfully obvious when something is edited.

  i’m pretty sure simply cranking up contrast and saturation can do it in most cases, because people just export to jpeg and that creates jagged compression artifacts.

  source