If there’s enough evidence to rule that this happened, that says a lot.
I hope Four Roses doesn’t screw up or I’m about to be out of luck.
Woodford Reserve tried to undermine unionization effort at its Kentucky distillery, judge rules
Submitted 7 months ago by FenrirIII@lemmy.world to workreform@lemmy.world
https://apnews.com/article/kentucky-woodford-reserve-distillery-ceb0032627b3d555080676e4ac89b764
Comments
RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 7 months ago
lanolinoil@lemmy.world 7 months ago
just start rotting corn in your tub
DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 7 months ago
No. A company with over a billion dollars in revenue? No, this all seems unlikely. Why would a company try to suppress the wages of its employees? There’s no incentive, and how would they even go about it if, for some strange reason they actually wanted to? It’s not like there’s a notorious power imbalance between employer and employees by the very nature of the relationship that only unionization (or like, socialism or something if you just wanted to be some kind of pinko) could possibly begin to address.
No, very unlikely, improbable, and doesn’t seem like the kind of thing that would or could happen here in these God’s Greatest Country Ever™.
makyo@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Damn Woodford Rye is my go-to sipping whiskey
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Woodford Reserve is owned by Brown-Foreman, who also owns Jack Daniels, Old Forester, Korbel, and Chambord.
There’s no way the subsidiary made those decisions alone. If you’re going to scratch Woodford off your list, you should also stop buying Jack, too.
Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Does anyone have a list of unionized distilleries?
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Are there any worker owned distilleries? I’d buy coop bourbon