Not really the point, but that’s a funny little oxymoron; to be a radical anything you’d need to be actually committed to something so much that you want to do actual ground work to further a cause.
Comment on Imperialism, authoritarianism and oppression is bad all around m'kay
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
“NOOOOOOO you have to pick one of the two teams or you’re a RADICAL CENTRIST!!!”
Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 1 week ago
sazey@lemmy.world 1 week ago
RarePossum@programming.dev 1 week ago
You could’ve gone with Radial centrism though
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It is a real thing but the term radical is used a bit different
The radical in the term refers to a willingness on the part of most radical centrists to call for fundamental reform of institutions.[1] The centrism refers to a belief that genuine solutions require realism and pragmatism, not just idealism and emotion
So not radical as in extremist action but radical change
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Lol, this place has changed its tone a lot now that the US election is over
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Now hang on. If you pretend the two teams are the same and refuse to pick a side because neither is perfect so it doesn’t matter, you are an enabler of fascism.
You can support a team while acknowledging their flaws. Refusing to play because the better team isn’t perfect is either naive or malicious.
dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
Or you can not join a team and evaluate things individually based on their merits
Soup@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You still have to commit to an actual decision when the times come. Adjusting each cycle is what everyone should be doing, knowing that each person will likely stay where they’re at because why wouldn’t they?
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s what I do.
Not surprisingly, the Republicans are always the worst and the only local opposition that has a slim chance of winning are Dems so I end up voting a straight Dem ticket despite refusing to register for the party. If there was an independent with a chance of winning I would consider them, but haven’t seen any on the local positions.
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yeah sure that works, unless one team is the Republican party.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If you like being ineffective at driving change, then yes this is an option. Otherwise, you’ll have to work through one of the gate keepers.
dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
You do have to take the context of power structures around you into account, but you do not have to assimilate into tribalism to be an effective voter.
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Once you talk about “both teams”, you imply there are only two instead of supporting those who to this day resist all states
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If you’re talking about a presidential election, there are two teams. The rest of the time, you should work on your own team, but when the big race is happening, there are only two viable contenders.
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
The meme is about US imperialism versus (supposedly) Chinese imperialism. And the election is over, not every meme is about that anymore.
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Shouldn’t you be then using some amendment to restore democracy? Because that surely isn’t democracy.
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Is this intentional misinterpretation for mischief purposes, or is this your best?
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 week ago
No, I’m saying there are “radical centrists” who pretend they are above the fray and claim both sides are equally flawed, while invariably showing up to vote for conservatives.
kautau@lemmy.world 1 week ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campism