BrainInABox

@BrainInABox@lemmy.ml

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  removed, you’re the one with the moral compass that thinks genocide is a good thing

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Break those rules at your peril.

  Lol. Yeah, you sound really “anti authoritarian”.

  No one mentioned Hamas, fascist. You condemned anti-genocide protesters because you consider the target of the genocide to be collectively deserving of extermination.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Ban = Quite Right.

  So you don’t actually “lean away from authoritarian” at all, you just want it to be wielded against your own political enemies.

  Still nothing wrong with protesting in favour of a misogynistic, homophobic, antidemocratic, murderous cult

  Ah, so you are, in fact, a genocidal fascist. I suppose it makes sense why you lied then.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Sure did

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  So you’re doing the classic thing of putting the burden of responsibility for your ridiculous claim on to somebody else to disprove. A classic sign of somebody not arguing in good faith.

  No, that was you making the claim that Wikipedia is pure unbiased fact and then putting the burden of responsibility on me to disprove it. But I know you don’t actually know what “arguing in good faith” means, it’s just a phrase you parrot after seeing it used on Reddit as magic incantation to win arguments.

  How can I prove that Wikipedia only lists facts

  If you don’t have evidence for it, why did you claim it? Just use what ever proof you based your original assertion on, assuming you had any.

  any evidence that I present, you will immediately disregard as untrue because of your preconceived bias.

  Wow, real good faith there, telling me what I’m going to do ahead of time. Sounds like you have nothing and you know it.

  I want you to link to any article, on any subject matter on Wikipedia (in English so we can actually read it, I know that trick) that proves your claim of bias. I genuinely don’t believe you will be able to because if you could provide this evidence, you would have linked to it in your original comment.

  I literally already gave you an example, but you intended it. Seems like you saying that I would “immediately disregard as untrue because of your preconceived bias” was just you projecting your own behaviour on to me.

  Your holy scripture arguement doesn’t work because Wikipedia isn’t a fixed source of stated reality, it’s a constantly changing constantly updated website.

  So it only lists facts, it doesn’t have a single biased article, but also its constantly changing… Hmmm. So apparently it doesn’t just state facts, it even changes what the facts are! Definitely nothing religious about that…

  Even if an article had some bias, by the end of the first day that bias would have been corrected by someone who didn’t like the bias.

  Orrrr a bias would have been introduced by someone who didn’t like the lack of bias.

  But you’re stating that there is a deep rooted institutional bias. I’d like you to indicate it please.

  I’d like you to explain how you determined that the overwhelming white, western, male, neoliberal perspective that dominates Wikipedia represents the One True unbiased perspective on reality. I’d like you to explain how you determined that sources like Radio Free Asia and the NYT, which Wikipedia treats as authoritative, are inherently always factual and unbiased despite having frequently lied in the past.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Then you chimed in anyway. Sorry I criticised your holy scripture

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m not saying Wikipedia is infallible

  Actually, you undeniably did: you said it “just lists facts”. You said that “Wikipedia itself is evidence that Wikipedia is factual”. You literally just said that “it’s better than any collection of knowledge humanity ever had.”

  This is how someone talks about religious scripture.

  Until then, don’t do the regular accusatory confessions you all do, it’s very boring and predictable.

  Go back to Reddit you wannabe anime villain loser. Jesus Christ, you zealots are incapable of not talking like the most bad faith smug man children alive.

  But here’s an example for your bad faith ass: Wikipedia states Israel has universal suffrage. Now let’s here your apologetic for why your holy book is correct even though it contradicts reality

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The evidence for it is Wikipedia itself

  So literally just the Holy Scripture argument: “the Bible is true, and the evidence is the Bible”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ll bet Grokipedia states the earth is a sphere too. Does it also “just list facts”

  I also don’t see you providing any evidence for your claim that Wikipedia “just lists facts”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  According to liberals.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve often said that liberals treat Wikipedia as Holy Scripture, and your comment is exactly that: an assertion that a particular work provides direct access to Truth. That anything it states is inherently “fact”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  They lean centre right

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Incoherent.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  “thinking that non-westerners are people sounds like fascism to me. I’m a leftist by the way”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  a little left of centre with a leaning towards liberty (i.e. away from authoritarian).

  Interesting. Tell me, what’s your opinion on the banning of Palestinian Action?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  So you’re wrong but too arrogant to admit it

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The vast majority of communists globally are “tankies”. I know that Westerners don’t consider non-westerners to be “real” though

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Not now that the term has expanded to mean everything to the left of Kamala Harris.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Political discourse⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Imagine looking at the current state of the USA and saying “communists are the problem!”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Least Ableist BlueAnoner

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  russias guilty of the vast majority of propaganda nd trolling on US MEDIA, and msm

  Do you have a source for that?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  ???

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It doesn’t bode well that even American Liberals are all turning into the villain from Dr. Strangelove.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  OK. I can’t force you to act in good faith.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I doubt that.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Least Ableist BlueAnoner

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve got to ask the liberals of this com: are you really not at all uncomfortable that the liberal discourse has descended to the level of the absolute toxic insanity of the above post? Like, honest question, how is this any different to the average MAGA chud at this point?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Yes

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve got to ask the liberals of this com: are you really not at all uncomfortable that the liberal discourse has descended to the level of the absolute toxic insanity of the above post? Like, honest question, how is this any different to the average MAGA chud at this point?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve got to ask the liberals of this com: are you really not at all uncomfortable that the liberal discourse has descended to the level of the absolute toxic insanity of the above post? Like, honest question, how is this any different to the average MAGA chud at this point?