Wait why are we killing bears?
Comment on conditional probability
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 month agoMen kill more women than bears even adjusted per encounter.
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 month ago
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Fits of jealousy.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Do they? That’s hard to believe but if they did the stats right then feel free to share. How do you even measure the number of encounters?
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Unfortunately, Steve’s data is wholly anecdotal. He’s killed 8 of the 10 women he’s ever met, see…
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 month ago
I’m not here to argue about the bear metaphor, but this claim seems spurious at best. Even if there’s only 1 fatal bear encounter per 10 years, the number of bear encounters is so low that I don’t think this statistic can possibly be true. Do you have anything to back up your claim, or is this just a gut feeling sort of thing?
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Have fun
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 month ago
This seems to be comparing percent of women who’ve been attacked by a bear to the percent of women who’ve been attacked by a man, which… I mean, I guess? But a more fair statistic would be comparing the percentage of bear encounters that result in an attack to the percentage of man encounters that result in an attack. This is also comparing fatal bear attacks to non-fatal man attacks.
I agree with the conclusion that a woman has a greater chance of being victimized by a man than by a bear, but this whole argument just feels like it’s designed to not stand up to critical analysis with the intent of labeling whoever tries to call it into question a misogynist, though, and I’m not going to get into all of that again.
EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
The entire question itself I don’t think was ever meant to hold up to any analysis. It’s more about making a statement on how threatened women feel in public. Bear attacks are rare while women are acutely aware of how dangerous being out in public feels. Roughly 20% will be sexually assaulted at least once, half of them before the age of 18, and that number jumps up to somewhere around 40% for trans women specifically, but the stats don’t account for the cultural pressure that’s exerted on every other woman outside of the victims by things like victim blaming and the way that men act in regards to women and their bodies. A simple look at current American politics is a perfect example of why women would “choose the bear.”
The whole thing kind of reminds me of the question about the walrus and the fairy that went around Tumblr earlier this year. It doesn’t matter what the stats say about the likelihood of a fairy being the one knocking at your door. More people would be surprised to find the walrus on their doorstep because at least with a fairy, you just have to accept that magic exists and not figure out how the walrus got there or learned how to knock on your door.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
That was an interesting read but it’s not the math per encounter. They strangely used lifetime stats and ignored number of encounters so it doesn’t answer that question.
Some of the other commenters who point out flaws in the math seem to get their comments deleted or downvoted so that doesn’t help. It’s a controversial topic which makes it really hard to just crunch numbers without being accused of picking a side or trying to skew the results.
Coming up with the stat that 10% of men will commit a rape in their lifetimes is wild though, and super sad if true.
psud@aussie.zone 1 month ago
The person doing the analysis also takes a statistic about intimate partner rape including where actual rape happened or the woman felt like he might have tried, then immediately casts it as actual rapes against strangers by serial street rapists.
It’s not in the least credible