Don’t worry, this particular map is just as useless for everyone.
Comment on I live in the green part
Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Coding data in color is a pet-peeve of mine. As a colorblind person, maps like this are nearly useless to me.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 weeks ago
tempest@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
There is an ISO somewhere that sets out color blind colors for accessibility.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Dark = bad
Ellvix@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Simulated red/green colorblind (the most common one)
Image
Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
This is how I see the map. Didn’t notice CO was green until a comment mentioned it.
Psythik@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s cause red and green both look like puke green to people with the most common type of colorblindness.
Opisek@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I first got this realization when I started using grey scale mode for my phone at night. A “good to bad” scale in an app became unintelligible. Since then I try to consider colorblindness if I design stuff myself. It’s fantastic if color scales carry meaning in both their colour but also the same meaning in their lightness, so everyone can understand them the same.
Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The green is almost exactly the same in value as the red.
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
If it helps, Washington D.C. and Colorado are the only “green” ones.
I don’t see anything represented by the “<20%”, “45%-50%” or “50%+” colors. Not sure why they’re even included.
Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Thanks, I could kind of tell CO by comparing to those around it, but that’s not an option the way DC is presented.
kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
The first 2 on the legend look darker than the following 3 .
I agree with the previous commenter. Colour coded maps are useless for about 25% of the population.
candybrie@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The green doesn’t follow that.