I refuse to believe any animal is older than doritos
Comment on stars & sharks
SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Sharks are older than trees.
They’re older than a lot of things. Land plants, Yellowstone, appendages,dinosaurs, doritos.
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 month ago
No they are wrong. Doritos are eternal.
Maturin@hexbear.net 1 month ago
What do you think the first several hundreds of millions of years were like before they had Doritos?
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Appendages? Like, fins?
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 1 month ago
He’s thinking of penguins
Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Like appendix I imagine.
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Aren’t appendages external?
Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 month ago
But are younger than the mountains.
Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Well…
Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 month ago
There’s no shark without Mountain Mama
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Ehhhh they’re younger than some mountains though. There are ranges that are over a billion years old, but the Himalayas are “only” some 50-70 million years old.
roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They’re mountains when it’s impressive that I can throw a football over them.
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Why did I read this to the tune of colors of the wind…
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Sharks are older than the grinning bobcat
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 month ago
But are they older than why he grins?
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Some of it.