Comment on America's Smartest Man Finds Something Interesting

TriflingToad@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

• tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I think a ton of trains would actually solve a lot of issues

  source

  • Omniraptor@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    yeah maybe we should let them cook for a bit

    source

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      My go to example for “we should have let them cook” is en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OGAS

      source
  • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    A ton of trains would be less than one train

    source

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Fine, we’ll upgrade to a shit ton instead.

      source
  • match@pawb.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    cats too tbh

    source

    • finkrat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Ironically may result in the resurgence of the bee population due to cats murdering the bird population

      source
• PriorityMotif@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • pupbiru@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    optimised solutions often create negative secondary effects in other systems - it’s not (always) that people are resistant to fixing things, it’s that when people get attached to an “optimised solution” and it comes into contact with the real world, it’s often difficult for them to take valid criticisms that aren’t about the system

    source

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      It’s almost always for a selfish reason though. For instance, health insurance in the U.S. could easily go away if the government combined all of the funding for public healthcare systems. It won’t happen because of the for profit healthcare industry.

      source
• just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Do not betray your own tribe brother. After all, why shouldn’t we get 27000 cats?

  source

  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    I’m allergic.

    source

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      skill issue

      source