Comment on Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
sunzu@kbin.run 6 months ago
Players could like stop paying for it... such an easy, low cost solution...
I got starfield for free with my video card, and I still feel ripped off and wish I could refund lol.
But yeah, I’m not dropping a single goddamn penny on Starfield. It feels like a game that was made for the xbox 360 or something, with all the loading screens and shit.
You get baited into accepting the quest and playing the first mission. Then you have to pay to continue.
WTF! That shit shouldn’t be legal.
I wouldn’t even play it if they paid me $7,-
That’s my route. Mods run on pirate skyrim just as well as legal and the best missions in Bethesda games aren’t made by Bethesda.
Yeah a lot of these entertainment companies forget that they need to earn my business with high quality product AND services, otherwise I will take matters into my own hands.
This aint like housing and work, where they can just fuck you as if they are your prison guards. We got options baby!
or worst case wait for the legendary version in a couple years with bug fixes and all dlc included.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 months ago
That is my current solution. Currently enjoying Factorio, which had the perfect monetization scheme: you buy the game.
Case@lemmynsfw.com 6 months ago
Not to mention, it is entirely possible to get home from work, play, and then realize you are now late for work.
Its just engaging on a level that most modern game’s can’t hope to achieve.
Hell, I’ve installed a game (old), then installed mods, then resolved all the mod issues, then launch it to realize I don’t actually want to play it.
Factorio? Mods are easy, and vanilla is enough to keep someone occupied and happy if they lack internet or something.
Its light weight too, it costs me virtually nothing to install it on anything that can run it.
Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Factorio also interestingly, never goes on sale, Wube said that the value of the game is what it is and that’s that.
Marcumas@lemmy.world 6 months ago
This only works because it’s only like $30. If this was a $60-70 game, I don’t think it goes over well with the public. Nintendo is the only one that seems to get away with that
batmaniam@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I think that’s exactly the point though. “We didn’t mark it up to mark it down, the price is just the price”. As a chronic patient gamer part of me hates that (I love finding older classics for like $10) but I don’t mind shelling out for a good game. The biggest expense is my time, and if a bunch of years later the price hasn’t moved it’s probably worth my time.
SaltySalamander@fedia.io 6 months ago
$35, actually.
vxx@lemmy.world 6 months ago
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Damn, R.I.P.