Getting all meat eaters to cut intake by 50% is easier than getting 50% of meat eaters to turn vegan.
Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong
dismay3915@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Common sense goes a long way. Radicalism is always stupid.
Just eat meat once a week or month. Eat whatever in moderation.
Moderation is key.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
AA5B@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Arguably carnivores have already cut meat intake, at least red meat, to greater impact than vegetarians.
While I’m going by anecdote rather than data
- vegetarians/vegans are a small minority so limited impact
- many people I know have cut back on at least red meat for health or environmental reasons.
Basically one fewer burger a week by 100 people has more impact than one person not eating meat at all
myyass@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
And that’s a more reasonable way of thinking. I tried being a vegetarian and a vegan. Not compatible with my body and factoring in supplements, too expensive.
theolodis@feddit.org 15 hours ago
I think that’s not true. The easiest would be to ban animal farming, which would cut consumption nearly entirely.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
“The easiest way is just me fiating this impossible idealistic nonsense in my own head”
You do you, man.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
Well easier than cutting everybody’s consumption by 50% lmao
You’d first need to capture the current consumption for everyone, so yes, a ban would be way easier to implement
myyass@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Um you know that historically lack of food lead to cannibalism right? … It’s still a thing today, everyday.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
You’re aware that there wou’d be more food, not less if we banned meat?
TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
Brb, giving up my entire means of livelihood in an environment where I can’t even sell off my assets because they are also banned, all in this job market. Sounds like a good way to quickly block major roadways with tractors, fuck cars should be happy.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
I am sure farmers could get free money to compensate, just like they did when trump fucked the soy trade with China. I didn’t hear about tractors on streets when that happened.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Top down approaches are almost never the answer.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
Ah good to know, let’s ignore all laws then, abolish religion and live in Anarchy. Wait that’s actually also fine with me.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
How is that easy?
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
You know, just like the prohibition, or banning drugs, you sign a law and because farms are usually big it’s easy to track them down.
remon@ani.social 15 hours ago
I don’t think fighting a civil war qualifies as an “easy way”.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
The government has the police and the military, there’s no way a guy with a rifle is doing something against an F15.
AA5B@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
An incremental step would be making it more expensive through taxes or regulation. A possible improvement rather than sitting on an impossible ideal
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
I’d take that, but is that going to happen? Doesn’t seem more realistic than a total ban.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 10 hours ago
Would you be willing to take up arms for that fight? Because meat eaters would be.
theolodis@feddit.org 2 hours ago
Yes, of course I would be ready. Meat eaters would take up arms like they take up arms to fight the Tyrants taking over the country.
People with firearms have them because they are scared, not because they would fight.
drmoose@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Thats not how world markets work though. 20% of meat eaters turning vegan would compound vegan movement more than 50% less meat consumed. The former grows vegan market explicitly while the latter just maybe shrinks the meat market only.
HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Radicalism is always stupid. Moderation is key.
How often do you eat babies?
Personally, I’m radically against eating babies.
jnod4@lemmy.ca 59 minutes ago
Equating human life to non human life is more psycho than meat-eaters tbh
BigPotato@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Everything in moderation, including moderation. You’ve got to choose what you’re radical about, lest it choose you.
HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
So in your opinion they were doing a ridiculous roundabout way to assert “Use your best moral judgement?”
My money’s on them never replying to agree or disagree with your guess at their intent.
zarathustrad@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
I only eat them as eggs.
ulterno@programming.dev 8 hours ago
I have got 3 maybe-babies lying in my fridge rn.
myyass@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I’m a glutton for fish eggs.
Gonzako@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Thank you for sharing my views I only murder once every 7 weeks but my friends say it’s not good.
dismay3915@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
“Murder” is a very strong (and wrong) word for killing animals.
Gonzako@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Oh bloody vegans coopting murder. I wanted to make a joke that’d you’d murder (people) in moderation.
davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
be careful. the blood mouths are not ready for your humour.
late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 14 hours ago
Who defines “common sense” and “moderation”? Meat eaters?
If vegans were majority, then you would be, too, called a radical for saying “we should build a slaughterhouse to give people PTSD”
I am not even vegan, but we can’t trust meat eating majority to write the rules on what’s acceptable amount of meat eating. This is just biased and unfair.
Ramsesder13te@feddit.org 13 hours ago
The important thing is that you appreciat it.
kadotux@sopuli.xyz 9 hours ago
A moderate genocide will do, local centrist claims
jnod4@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
You’re doing a moderate genocide every time you change your diet or even the ph of your mouth. Those bacteria didn’t consent to die
kadotux@sopuli.xyz 8 hours ago
Was that an argument?