Comment on ` ` ` `

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• endlessvoid@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  …did they just ai him out of the photo, cause that’s what it looks like!

  source

  • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Yeah, that’s fucking creepy, that it’s the same expressions, but also she suddenly has really long arms to hold that kid…

    source

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Who the hell takes these publications seriously if they do shit like this? Damn

      source
    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I don’t see it, her arms are regular sized?

      The arm on the right is from the kid, you know.

      source

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Look at the original photo in the post, then look at this one.

        source
      • MML@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        The kid also has 4 toes

        source
    • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      And the boy behind her has the body and stance of a sixty-something who just ran up the stairs.

      source
  • SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Honestly a good use of it for once

    source

    • Rothe@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      No, the media should not engage in undisclosed doctoring of photos like that. That is pretty heinous stuff.

      Either they shouldn’t have used the photo, or blurred him or some shit if they absolutely wanted him out of the photo.

      Just think in what other instances they do that to photos without disclosing it.

      source
    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yeah no. Judged as not trustworthy, that site.

      source

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Is there an anti-pulitzer for crimes against journalism? We could submit this for consideration

        source