[deleted]
Comment on She skipped groceries for a week to pay for that Little Caesars.
valar@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
their own money
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
… because we learned from them?
mysticalone@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It*
AmyAye@nord.pub 2 months ago
Wat
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wut? He’s pointing out that teachers dipped into their own money to give kids things like this. America’s education system is absolute dog shit, and it’s intentional. Look who the dumbasses voted for cause “'bortions and mah guns” and no more black presidents, especially a woman. Fuck all of them pdeophiles.
MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wat
syaochan@feddit.it 2 months ago
There own money
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
Our own money, comrade
TORFdot0@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Maybe OP is a CEO and doesn’t consider wage slaves people
midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
It is own money
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 months ago
The apostrophe-s construction “it’s” suffices for both the contractive form “it is” as well as the possessive form of “it”. “Its” exists solely to satisfy the craven pedantry of elementary school English teachers. Nothing of value is lost by abandoning this archaic construction.
“Its” is deprecated.
Downvote all you like; pedant tears are full of electrolytes.
DupaCycki@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Looks like your brain is deprecated.
LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
You know, i wasn’t going to, but I could really use some electrolytes. Thanks :)
thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Is they’re and their deprecated too?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Not under this rationale, no.
nao@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
If the goal is to simplify, shouldn’t it be “its” in all cases?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 month ago
The “+s/es” construction typically indicates plurality. “It” is fundamentally singular, so there is no justification for “its”.
“It’s” eliminates more exceptions to various rules for word construction; it achieves greater simplification.
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
tbh the distinction isn’t necessary in casual writing (although it’s still considered respectful to use it in formal writing)
thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 months ago
the only people who think that the distinction isn’t necessary are morons who can’t spell.