Comment on classic

jobbies@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• toofpic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It’s not the movie, it’s the families should be halal!

  source

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    So they can be eaten with no risk of Allah taking offense?

    source

    • Tiral@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Well, typically you eat the fish not the families, but I guess you could?

      source
• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  … Dory is a fish.

  Why would fish need to follow instructions given to humans?

  source

  • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Because it’s a cartoon in which all the fish are speaking English, engaged in human activities & personalities & situational drama just like humans.

    source

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      … Are the fish Muslim?

      As part of their acting like humans?

      Also, generally speaking, fish are halal to eat.

      So there’s no reason for a non muslim fish to either literally not be halal, as food, nor abide by muslim dress code, as a ‘person’.

      The widely varying different standards of Islamic Dress Codes != Halal.

      To conflate the two would be like asking if a Yarmulke is Kosher. Its … nonsensical.

      source

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        there’s no reason for a non muslim fish to either literally not be halal nor abide by muslim dress code

        This is peak content. May the light of Allah shine upon Dory and guide her to the truth, inshallah.

        source
      • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        If the fish aren’t Muslim then perhaps that poster up there should not be advertising the movie night as “Halal” 🤭

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  🤔 Semi-serious question, is she still required to cover her head if she has no hair?

  source