“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
Comment on IBM 1979 variation
flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 11 hours agoHow would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
b_tr3e@feddit.org 10 hours ago
MoffKalast@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
"The good book saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’ - Preacherbot
b_tr3e@feddit.org 6 hours ago
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 3 hours ago
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 8 hours ago
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Homosexuality then.
Wait.b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 hours ago
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
real_squids@sopuli.xyz 11 hours ago
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
real_squids@sopuli.xyz 7 hours ago
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 hours ago
Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.