“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
Comment on [deleted]
flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks agoHow would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
MoffKalast@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
"The good book saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’ - Preacherbot
b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Ones and zeroes everywhere! And I thought I saw a two!
It was just a dream, Bender. There’s no such thing as two.
flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Homosexuality then.
Wait.b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 week ago
clank clank clank clank
SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD!
Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later
clank clank clank clank
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.