Still don’t understand how this could possibly generate energy.
GraniteM@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Harrumph
chunes@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
the power plant is in space and beams energy to the dish.
chunes@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Right, but like… whatever you’re doing in space is going to be more cost effective to do on earth. Not to mention the insane amount of energy lost to the atmosphere
saturn57@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Energy loss for wireless energy transition is actually surprisingly low. Here is an example of 80% efficiency over 1 kilometer: ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1123672
vithigar@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
Unless you really need to optimise for land use. An arbitrarily large solar array in space could transmit to a fairly small collector in the surface.
As for losing power to atmospheric attenuation, high frequency microwaves will pass right through most everything that would scatter visible light. Clouds, dust, etc wouldn’t really impede it.
I won’t say it’s not a silly idea, because it is. It’s fun to think about though.
Zron@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Big solar panel
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
musk wants datacenters in space. which makes sense, 24/7 sunlight and no transmission of power is grand; but I do wonder about the shielding and moving the data back and forth.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
yeah but imagine you can put the plant and all the pollution on an asteroid or something.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 hours ago
All that yet microwaves still leave my burrito frozen in the center.
GraniteM@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Gotta lower the power setting and increase the cook time. One minute at 100%? No! One and a half minutes at 80%!
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
also, offset from the center of the microwave on the spinny plate. centered will only get you a portion of the waveform, moving the food around through a larger cross-section of the waveform = more thoroughly cooked stuff.