The question was “who’s a good dog?”
Comment on Why are dogs?
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 days ago
“We tested the aerodynamics of dogs in search of answers.”
“What was the question?”
“The results are that some dogs are very aerodynamic.”
“WHAT WAS THE QUESTION??”
Etterra@discuss.online 2 days ago
rumba@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
How much grant money can we get to test the aerodynamic nature of dogs.
ranzispa@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Even in the most basic research having an hypothesis is important, even just to say “I was completely wrong, but in the end extremely lucky and found something I didn’t expect nobody cares about”.
Hypothesis Aerodynamics experimentation does not damage internal organs of dogs.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that wind tunnels are not dangerous to the well being of dogs. Such findings open new research opportunities in the field of dog aerodynamics.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
*dogaerodynamics
Ininewcrow@piefed.ca 3 days ago
If we move a dog up to 200 mph, they are very aerodynamically efficient
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 days ago
what dog is best for racing
Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 days ago
How are mongolian dogs able to withstand the harsh mongolian steppe winds without falter ?
Possible applications in biomimetism :