Comment on Why are dogs?
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“We tested the aerodynamics of dogs in search of answers.”
“What was the question?”
“The results are that some dogs are very aerodynamic.”
“WHAT WAS THE QUESTION??”
Even in the most basic research having an hypothesis is important, even just to say “I was completely wrong, but in the end extremely lucky and found something I didn’t expect nobody cares about”.
Hypothesis Aerodynamics experimentation does not damage internal organs of dogs.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that wind tunnels are not dangerous to the well being of dogs. Such findings open new research opportunities in the field of dog aerodynamics.
*dogaerodynamics
If we move a dog up to 200 mph, they are very aerodynamically efficient
The question was “who’s a good dog?”
How much grant money can we get to test the aerodynamic nature of dogs.
what dog is best for racing
Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
How are mongolian dogs able to withstand the harsh mongolian steppe winds without falter ?
Possible applications in biomimetism :