I thought about that as I wrote it! I stand by what I said.
Comment on Why are fruits and berries healthy, even though they are mostly just sugar?
SatyrSack@quokk.au 13 hours agonobody serious is suggesting you eat only fruit
spongebue@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
So where’s does he claim to only eat fruit?
Are you confusing it with him recommending to use Apple?paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
He was someone who was a fruititarian at various points in his life. He was also someone who didn’t shower at certain points in his life.
TheMadCodger@piefed.social 10 hours ago
My ex- decided to become a fruititarian, with hopes of becoming a breathitarian someday after reading about a yogi who allegedly had done so.
Emphasis on the ex-.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
OK, that only confirms to me that he was in fact insane. There is no way we are supposed to eat only fruit, it simply doesn’t provide any real energy, but consumes as much as it yields, meaning there is no way to survive on fruit alone.
snooggums@piefed.world 11 hours ago
He chose to not listen to medical advice for cancer and instead dragged things out with 'alternative medicine' long enough that real medical treatment wouldn't be successful anymore but still pulled strings to get a transplant.
He was nuts.
Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
Notorious for having a long life…
twice_hatch@midwest.social 13 hours ago
56 is long if you were born around 1901
meco03211@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Is it? I always thought lower life expectancies were dragged down by infant mortality. Basically if you survive the crib you’d likely live into your 70s.
snooggums@piefed.world 11 hours ago
When referring to diseases, yeah, but there was also a lot of death from wars and other violence, severe injuries from dangerous labor, and labor was pretty risky. If one was healthy and avoided injury they were certainly on par with modern life spans.
boatswain@infosec.pub 11 hours ago
Yeah, that’s what my dad says, and he’s a medieval historian, so I believe him. I guess it’s possible that lifespan in 1901 was much shorter than the middle ages, but that seems unlikely
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I’m pretty sure Jobs either didn’t die at 56 or wasn’t born around 1901.