I honestly don’t know what this “trainwreck” talk is. BL3 was passable. I didn’t like the antagonists, but the game played fine if purples dropped way too much and the new guns weren’t great. People make it seem like it was the Worst Game Ever and I don’t get it. The pre-sequel was hot garbage, but 3 was fine.
After the borderlands 3 trainwreck it seems weird that people are apparently buying BL4
CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 10 hours ago
jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
From what I hear from people actually able to play the game, it’s better than 3.
Something like:
2 > 4 > 1 > 3 > Pre-Sequel
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
It’s hard to consider an 81 on OpenCritic to be a trainwreck. People tend to buy games that review well, especially when it’s a co-op shooter with basically no competition.
Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Damn I had to look that up cause it seemed unbelievable. I am shocked it reviewed that well. It just seemed so awful to me.
Am I so out of touch?? No, the children are.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
You aren’t out of touch. Even the worst games don’t get that poor of a review. When you job depends on being on their side, it turns out you can’t voice an honest opinion.
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Nah, that game’s great. The writing’s not good, especially for the villains, but people like that game because it’s good.