If you are unable to make the content yourself then it’s not worth making. Either pass the ideas onto someone that can or learn to draw and stop destroying the environment with this slop.
Even if AIs weren’t inherently harmful, the companies that make them are. And by utilising, publicising, and integrating in your workflow their product you are pumping their value and giving them both more means and more reasons to fuck people over. And because making and selling an AI requires a giant mega corporation, there cannot be a free (as in freedom) alternative.
On top of this, the AI is actually harmful. First of all, they are building their value by stealing other people’s work. They also use psychological tricks to try to give you dependency, that’s why AIs are always overly cheerful, always complimenting questions, and why companies try to humanise the product, they do this to convince you to integrate their AI in your workflow, and once it’s done, your business becomes dependent on them, and that makes them money.
And if that wasn’t enough, everything you tell the AI is both used to improve the AI, and to profile for advertising.
The environmental impact of using generative AI is obscene. I don’t have the source for the claim, but I’ve seen an estimate that an AI generated image creates as much damage as a gallon of gasoline being burned for substantially less actual use.
salty_chief@lemmy.world 2 months ago
No. I was testing the platform to see how similar it is to Reddit. I have my answer. Thanks.
salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 2 months ago
You were hoping for unconditional validation? I think I know where you can go for that.
Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Fun fact: Reddit is the same as here, and so is everywhere else on the internet.
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Well, at least in the context of OPs question “do people on other platforms also see me as a fool?”
Turns out it’s a big old (not in an ageist way, don’t worry OP) “Yes.”
salty_chief@lemmy.world 2 months ago
So the internet is dead then?
BroBot9000@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Do you really need to have a list of why people are sick of Ai slop?
Ai is literally making people dumber:
microsoft.com/…/lee_2025_ai_critical_thinking_sur…
www.theregister.com/…/is_ai_changing_our_brains/
They are a massive privacy risk:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyH7zoP-JOg&t=3015s
theconversation.com/ai-tools-collect-and-store-da…
Are being used to push fascist ideologies into every aspect of the internet:
…org.uk/…/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/
And they are a massive environmental disaster:
news.mit.edu/…/explained-generative-ai-environmen…
forbes.com/…/ai-is-accelerating-the-loss-of-our-s…
If you are unable to make the content yourself then it’s not worth making. Either pass the ideas onto someone that can or learn to draw and stop destroying the environment with this slop.
Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
If you can’t see why people don’t like AI slop, you are either in denial or completely oblivious.
Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
This is like the worst false equivalence I have ever seen.
psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
The internet is dead when every content is AI generated, so yes we’re heading that way.
edinbruh@feddit.it 2 months ago
Even if AIs weren’t inherently harmful, the companies that make them are. And by utilising, publicising, and integrating in your workflow their product you are pumping their value and giving them both more means and more reasons to fuck people over. And because making and selling an AI requires a giant mega corporation, there cannot be a free (as in freedom) alternative.
On top of this, the AI is actually harmful. First of all, they are building their value by stealing other people’s work. They also use psychological tricks to try to give you dependency, that’s why AIs are always overly cheerful, always complimenting questions, and why companies try to humanise the product, they do this to convince you to integrate their AI in your workflow, and once it’s done, your business becomes dependent on them, and that makes them money. And if that wasn’t enough, everything you tell the AI is both used to improve the AI, and to profile for advertising.
medgremlin@midwest.social 2 months ago
The environmental impact of using generative AI is obscene. I don’t have the source for the claim, but I’ve seen an estimate that an AI generated image creates as much damage as a gallon of gasoline being burned for substantially less actual use.