What about the people ignoring complete history of the Palestinian people and blindly supporting Isreal?
Comment on lemmy.ml
undef@feddit.de 1 year agoI also disagree with many things the Israeli government does. But when people ignore the complete history of Israel and exclusively ventilate the pro-Palestinian propaganda, a red line is crossed for me.
Bassman27@lemmy.world 1 year ago
mashbooq@infosec.pub 1 year ago
What about people ignoring the possibility of a comet hitting the earth?
Bassman27@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What about the second coming of Jesus?
Norgur@kbin.social 1 year ago
The christian churches around the world would hate that. He'd hand their asses to them for being backwards bigots and overall betrayers of his message.
Toldry@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They’re also doing more harm than good. This is an immensley complicated situation that requires nuance.
Bassman27@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Dare I say all this could have been avoided if they weren’t mistreated for nearly 70 years?
zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I’m extremely curious what you see as the complete history.
archiotterpup@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t see how European guilt for allowing a genocide excuses another.
ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The complete history of Israel forcing Palestinians into ghettos and systematically slaughtering them? The fact that they told civilians to flee to the south and then bombed the very area they claimed would be safe? The fact that they claim the right to self determination but refuse to allow the Palestinians the same right? The fact that netanyahu funded Hamas to destabilize the region so that he’d have pretense to carry out his war crimes?
I don’t condone the attacks by Hamas, but to pretend that Israel isn’t trying to carry out a genocide is crossing a red line for me.
coyootje@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This whole conflict has just always felt like a massive grey area as an outsider. Both sides have done horrible things over the years, with the retaliation often being even worse. Most governments (including mine) are actually supporting both sides, for example through humanitarian aid. That’s just kind of weird when you think about it, in a way they’re enabling both sides to keep going. And I just don’t know if there’s any way out of this besides one side completely destroying the other. Peace talks have been had so many times and it just doesn’t lead anywhere. It just feels inevitable.
LordGimp@lemm.ee 1 year ago
There is no argument for “both sides bad” when one side is currently right now this instant blowing up hospitals, schools, and children. One side is objectively worse and it’s the side hiding behind the skirts of “antisemitism” as they carry out an Arabic genocide
hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I disagree.
Both sides are bad, no matter who is currently the aggressor.
Now because there is aggression, the aggressor has an obligation to stop it, and we have an obligation to force a stop in the conflict as well. But that doesn’t make the other party less Bad in this. Both sides killed a lot of innocent people, both have inhumane ulterior motives and both are supporting further escalation. But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.
This distinction is very important to me, because you are not suddenly the good guy because you stopped killing civilians. You are just not actively doing war crimes which means we don’t have to intervene because of you anymore, which is at least one less reason. But you are not holy because “this year it was only 300 war crimes”.