Comment on Anon studies human behavior

HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Pronounced the same as tamales.

  source

  • Randelung@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Testicles is looking for females!

    source

    • refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Is Testicles an ancient Greek god?

      source
• umbrella@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  theres our hint.

  source
• spacecadet@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  ☕️

  source
• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Is treating females like a dirty, toxic word advancing a good cause?

  At least they don’t judge.

  source

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    because people who use females will say men and females - presumably because referring to them as women humanizes them

    source

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      because people who use females will say men and females

      Do you ignore all the instances they don’t? OP’s writer wrote women & used females to refer to female people (girls or women).

      The post I linked to shows another use of noun female.

      Singles communities, personals, classifieds, marketplaces offer abundant instances.

      The word appears often in book titles & passages, especially feminist literature.

      Seems your claim requires ignoring much regular English usage: it’s false.

      presumably

      That’s presuming an awful lot contrary to regular usage.

      Regardless of motive, the act is the same: indiscriminately picking problems over females. If everyone did that, females would be generally accepted as a dirty, toxic word. Again: what good does that advance?

      It’s thoughtless, self-destructive language policing.

      source

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Did OP use “males” anywhere?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Image

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Female is not a noun.

    source

    • samus12345@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yes, it is. It’s just offensive to refer to a person as such when it’s not in a scientific or formal context.

      source

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        A non-scientific, informal context was given. Show us the offense there.

        This is straight-up misguided language policing. Again, what good is served by treating female like a toxic, dirty word?

        source
    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      dictionary entry:

      female

      noun

      1. 1. a female person : a woman or a girl
         2. an individual of the sex that is typically capable of bearing young or producing eggs
      2. a pistillate plant

      source

      • tetris11@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        a pistillate plant

        I’m a hwat?

        source
• arin@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Not age specific could be girls or women

  source

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    hes literally saying “young females”

    source

    • arin@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      And yes this could include any young women and girls but instead of saying both nouns he says one noun that includes both discriptors which is female instead of girl or young women

      source

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        So anon is asking why young girls didn’t accept his friend request?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Unless they are talking about 10 year olds, “women” is acceptable.

    source

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      So is “females” in regular English usage.

      source
• fushuan@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  In his defence, the first use of females was correct, “those who are young single and female” as an adjective. I’d say that the second one is wrong, but they did use women above too so I’d attribute it to having written female just above and typical 4chan brainrot. I’d keep an eye on this one but not crucify yet

  source