Why? Is there a legitimate reason for anyone to own or be able to easily purchase a ninja sword?
Comment on Ninja sword owners will be paid to surrender weapons before ban
shani66@ani.social 1 week ago
Man, the uk is a silly place
MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Why would you need a reason—legitimate or otherwise—to justify owning a sword?
MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Because it’s a weapon.
Ninja swords – which have a blade between 14 inches and 24 inches long with one straight cutting edge with a tanto-style point – have been linked to the surge in knife crime which has risen to more than 50,000 offences in the past year, close to its record high in 2019.
lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
It’s ridiculous to ban them because of that. The criminals could just use a kebab knife instead or whatever. A proper way would be to ban carrying all long knives around, except in closed boxes. So the kebab guy or sword collector can buy a knife and bring it to his restaurant/home, but by the time a criminal gets it out of the box ppl can call the police and it’s already a crime.
ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 1 week ago
Because it’s a weapon.
So is a water pistol. Depends if I change the pH of the water?
bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 1 week ago
How many of these were done with a freaking katana LMAO
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
yeah, decoration/recreation (or do you want to ban the bow and arrow too? maybe ban boxing gloves?)/historical preservation
banning swords is absurd, if anything you want miscreants to use swords because they’re fucking massive and obvious, you can’t conceal a katana.
meanwhile if someone wants to kill and not make that fact visible, they can just… keep a screwdriver in their pocket and stab someone, and you’re never going to ban screwdrivers.
stray@pawb.social 1 week ago
yeah, decoration/recreation (or do you want to ban the bow and arrow too? maybe ban boxing gloves?)/historical preservation
Blunt weapons and historical items are not banned per this legislation.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
Yeah, i mean if someone really wants to decapitate someone they can just go to the next best hardware store and get a chainsaw. This is so pointless.
Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Playing devil’s advocate, chainsaws are used for cutting trees and other tasks, they are not inherently a weapon unlike a sword (these are similar arguments to the ones used about gun control). I do find it silly to ban weeb swords, but mostly because I don’t think they’re ever really used for crimes? Or did I miss some info about a wave of ninja murders in the UK?
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
Yeah there are probably more deaths from chainsaws than those swords. But yeah ofcourse in this case there is no legal use case other than artistic value. For things like folding knives tho there are lots of good legal uses and they are still banned.
smeg@feddit.uk 1 week ago
I think you’re only banned from carrying locking knives (or big knives) in public without a good reason, so on the very off-chance you were questioned by plod then “I’m a tradie going to work” or whatever should be a fine explanation.
shani66@ani.social 1 week ago
Wait, they ban basic knives as well? Might as well ban nail clippers!
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 week ago
This will probably be a reaction to the Hainault sword attack last year which resulted in the murder of a schoolboy, attempted murder of others, and an attack on a sleeping family, using a samurai sword. The trial is due to start tomorrow.
stray@pawb.social 1 week ago
They are unfortunately being used by children, who understandably think they look sick as shit, to murder each other. Here are some “highlights”:
www.bbc.com/news/articles/czddg1zvl34o
www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-66187503
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
archive.is/52YjV#selection-515.0-533.242
I will bet you that Parliament would be willing to impose a ban on possession of a chainsaw without just cause.