Comment on My Honest Opinion

Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• MarcomachtKuchen@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  For me it would not be about enforcing but about giving the option to disclaim it.

  source

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    exactly 👍

    source
• rtxn@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  If AI artists are so confident that they are equals, why are they trying so hard to hide it?

  source

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Because it gets a negative response? Regardless of whether they think it has a valid place as an art form, if they know it will get a negative response they probably won’t want to share it.

    source

    • rtxn@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      As a result, suspicion falls on everyone and AI image uploaders are seen as dishonest.

      There’s an Among Us joke there that I just can’t find.

      source
  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I made a cool new avatar concept for one of my public accounts, shared it with some people to see what they thought, used AI to do so. Everyone said it was amazing and they couldn’t wait to see it in use until I mentioned it was an AI mockup to use to pay someone to make something like it, then suddenly it sucked

    It’s like Hitler’s paintings, they’re kinda somewhat decent enough for what they are but because of who/what made them they’re suddenly a big deal

    source

    • ReCursing@lemmings.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Naah, hitler’s paintings were actually pretty crap, him getting rejected from art school was entirely justified

      source

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        They’re not art school caliber, but I’d definitely be impressed if a random friend of mine had painted one

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Wtf I was with you until the part on Hitler’s paintings

      Edit: looked up Hitler’s paintings. Damn. They’re actually…

      source
  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    We’re not trying to hide it, we care if you think it’s AI or not. We just want to make majestic art

    source

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      ‘make majestetic art’ art isn’t just ‘content’. It’s supposed to have thought and emotion behind it. Come back to me when you have spent 3 hours slaving over a real piece, where every single stroke has a thought behind it.

      source

      • ReCursing@lemmings.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        The amount of effort that goes into something has no bearing on its value, otherwise Leonardo’s doodles are less valuable than your efforts, and that’s clearly bollocks

        source
      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I think if you’re an art enthusiast, maybe, but for me I just go “oo pretty”

        AI art

        source
    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Then why not label the method of production?

      source

      • ReCursing@lemmings.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Why? Do you need a label saying “made with pencils”? The hate bubble is deflating and you lot are losing. Get on with it already

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Because I don’t care enough to?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  as AI art gets increasingly better

  I don’t see it getting better nearly so much as I see it getting pervasive. When AI is one submission in ten and you’ve got a 90% flag rate, you can trim the instance of unflagged content to one submission in a hundred. But when AI is nine submissions in ten, half your feed is still AI-slop. When its ninety-nine submissions in a hundred, you’re looking at nine AI images in ten even with a filter.

  The AI doesn’t need to get any better at evading the filter. It just needs to beat the filter by raw numbers.

  source