qwerty
@qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
- Submitted 4 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 19 comments
- Comment on Anon walks home in the city at 2 AM 5 weeks ago:
SIMP!!!
- Submitted 1 month ago to greentext@sh.itjust.works | 11 comments
- Comment on Blessica Blimpson 1 month ago:
What?
- Comment on Adopting a stray cat 5 months ago:
I think the horsefucker would agree with me.
- Comment on Adopting a stray cat 5 months ago:
Neither do crackheads.
- Comment on Adopting a stray cat 5 months ago:
Yeah being homeless sucks, what does that have to do with cats reproducing?
Even if we assume that all unplanned kittens end up homeless, it’s still some twisted version of financial cat eugenics. “Your life will probably not adhere to my standards of what a good life is, so I will prevent you from existing in the first place for your own good. I will cut off your balls because your kids would be homeless.”
Now apply the same logic to humans. I know we are talking about cats but from a moral standpoint it should make no difference, the degree of “bad” might change, it’s less bad if you do that to an animal and more bad if you do that to a human, but in both cases it’s still bad. I can’t think of anything that this logic doesn’t apply to, even when it comes to something we do all the time like killing, if you do that to a human, that’s murder, which is obviously terrible and if yo do that to an animal, that’s acceptable, because we need it for food to survive but it’s still bad. If we could get meat any other way I don’t think anyone would be opposed to that.
If you don’t want to get castrated by aliens\AI overlords then don’t do that to your pets.
- Comment on Adopting a stray cat 5 months ago:
Are cats not allowed to reproduce anymore?
- Comment on Tethered Bottle Caps 5 months ago:
Based.
- Comment on Anon helps with his gf's vaping addiction 6 months ago:
Regulations having the exact opposite effect than desired. Classic.
