voodooattack
@voodooattack@lemmy.world
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 3 hours ago:
“if it’s punishable by a fine, it’s legal for a price, which isn’t even that high”.
And where is the “funny” in restating the obvious without making any effort to make it sound like absurdist deep thoughts? I could have sent a mildly worded letter, would you have preferred that?
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 3 hours ago:
Class treachery? I am a middle aged software dev that finally got bit by RSI; I ain’t rich and I got no savings, so who do you think is gonna feed my kids if I stop working with AI?
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 10 hours ago:
Most of what you speak of is caused by this simple statement from the onset:
You use it as a tool, that’s it.
If you use it as a tool, then expecting anything but minimal compliance would be an irrational expectation, because it will do exactly as you ask, which is the bare minimum to satisfy your requirements.
I got tired of that, so as an experiment, I decided to go about it differently, and made a couple discoveries about how to make it work. Turns out LLMs can’t pattern match things they don’t have in their training sets.
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 13 hours ago:
That’s a very convincing argument. Thank you for the insight.
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 17 hours ago:
Accessibility is key!
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 18 hours ago:
Accessibility is of extreme importance to me.
- Comment on The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall 18 hours ago:
It is! Everything you see here comes from collaboration with AI.
Mainly because I’m an old fart with too many ideas and RSI to stop me from doing anything with them, so I can’t exactly do it myself with a mouse and keyboard.
Don’t go hating my executive prosthetics. Collaboration with AI can be a positive force. It’s just being used and marketed the wrong way.
No single human is likely to have deep expertise in all of those domains simultaneously, whereas an LLM can synthesize explanations across them instantly.
- Submitted 20 hours ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 15 comments
- Submitted 20 hours ago to [deleted] | 2 comments
- Comment on Backup 6 days ago:
Good for you. Glad I could make a change today.
- Comment on Backup 6 days ago:
I see your point, but the people you’re speaking of (ones who don’t check the community name before taking this for granted) are probably not going to be reading these comments either, they’re most likely 400 metric screen-spans away by now and pausing a couple milliseconds as they try to parse a post about jeans made out of beans.
- Comment on A reminder that modern scientific publishing was pioneered by Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell 1 week ago:
Kinda ironic that game theory papers must go through a negative sum medium ain’t it?
- Comment on 😉 😉 2 weeks ago:
I finally get it. It’s not “wedlock”, it’s “bedlock”. Which seems like a kind of like a bikelock because it is made for securing a vehicle. Easy. Now I get high score on English test.
- Comment on Sad 3 weeks ago:
8GB of storage is too little to hold his pain
- Comment on Nerve-controlled prosthetics 5 weeks ago:
“I specifically asked for this”
- Comment on Anon has a very specific goal 1 month ago:
Both of them?
- Comment on Transform 1 month ago:
Fast courier transform is worse
- Comment on There are 206 bones in the human body or 207 if your guts are long enough 1 month ago:
If you fall for those tricks, you’re boned.
- Comment on New kink unlocked 2 months ago:
BEEP BEEP MOTHERFUCKER
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Bro… where’s /c/metashitposting?
I normally don’t go full meta, but the world needs an emergency pun transfusion
- Comment on there is a special place in hell for these scientists 2 months ago:
Finally, I know when I saved this to my phone there would be a perfect moment. (Humanity is too predictable)
Attribution: lemmy.world/post/43077529
- Comment on Unhinged... I'm gonna start doing that 2 months ago:
People who still use smilies: am I a joke to you? :D
- Comment on No More Neutral ⚛ 2 months ago:
What if it’s one extra neutron? >.>
- Comment on Well that sucks 3 months ago:
LEN(GTH)? (OH)MY… TINY.
- Comment on What if POOLS and SEVERANCE had a baby? IGN just posted my indie game trailer : ) 3 months ago:
It’s in the family of paradoxical/recursive humour I truly enjoy.
Kinda like: “I’m the humblest person on Earth!” and “You’re no true Novellist! You can’t exclaim about exclamations!”
- Comment on What if POOLS and SEVERANCE had a baby? IGN just posted my indie game trailer : ) 3 months ago:
Congrats!
My favourite part of that trailer:
YOU HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO VOLUNTEER…
I love it!
- Comment on 3 months ago:
I write fiction and use Celsius. So what I usually have to deal with is the exact opposite of what you’re talking about.
- Comment on Your GF has always wanted to know the answer 3 months ago:
You guys don’t wash?
- Comment on Lawks 4 months ago:
Not the OP of this post. The OOP of thatscreenshot on whatever platform they used. It probably didn’t originate here.
The fact it got here is evidence enough that the propagation strategy is viable, and the fact it won’t spread as effectively here (but it still can if people decide to manually repost/share and spread it to other communities or platforms) does not contradict that.
- Comment on Lawks 4 months ago:
The overzealous censorship is possibly a feature not a bug. Done deliberately by the OP to ragebait people who find it disagreeable for a free engagement boost.
The meme/trend wouldn’t be so ubiquitous right now if it weren’t so successful at its own self-propagation, because it’s being naturally selected for.
