SparroHawc
@SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Everything is a problem 1 day ago:
That’s because the TVs are subsidized by selling your stolen info.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
EA and Ubisoft are really duking it out for the first prize in the worst game company competition.
- Comment on He's camera shy 5 days ago:
…Italians?
- Comment on Anon isn't a Microsoft fan 5 days ago:
I even tried to migrate mine, and it failed. After deleting my Mojang account.
Tech support made a token attempt to help me and then gave up.
- Comment on Anon does some online shopping 2 weeks ago:
It’s a two-fold curse - first, every single program these days isn’t a stand-alone program, it’s a glorified web browser. Hand-in-hand with that is the fact that, in order for these webpages-disguised-as-programs to behave in the way you normally expect a modern UI to act, it has to have five layers of javascript frameworks, each adding its own pile of cruft to the slagheap that is modern app design. It’s horrendous and I hate it.
- Comment on AGI achieved 🤖 5 weeks ago:
Erm. I’m trying to clear up what I thought looked like misconceptions you have about AI in regards to real-world applications, but I seem to have come on too strong, and I apologize; I have a tendency to put on a know-it-all attitude and it’s something I’m trying to work on.
Have a good day, I’ll leave you alone now.
- Comment on AGI achieved 🤖 5 weeks ago:
you called me a robot racist.
…what?
Looking up the most common answer isn’t intelligence, there is no understanding of cause and effect going on inside the algorithm
In order for that to be true, the entire dataset would need to be contained within the LLM. Which it is not. If it were, a model wouldn’t have to undergo training.
AI implies intelligence
You seem to be mistaking ‘intelligence’ for ‘human-like intelligence’. This is not how AI is defined. AI can be dumber than a gnat, but if it’s capable of making decisions based on stimulus without each set of stimulus and decision being directly coded into it, then it’s AI.
- Comment on AGI achieved 🤖 1 month ago:
Okay, what is your definition of AI then, if nothing burned onto silicon can count?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 1 month ago:
If a seagull is stealing chips from someone, odds are there are plenty of other seagulls around to witness their compatriot getting merked.
Seagulls understand that stealing from humans is risky - that’s why they generally do it very quickly. The ones who fail suffer consequences for their failure, same as stealing food from any other creature. It’s the risk/reward calculation any scavenger has to make.
Sometimes they calculate incorrectly. They get forcibly removed from the gene pool.
- Comment on AGI achieved 🤖 1 month ago:
No. Artificial Intelligence has to be imitating intelligent behavior - such as the ghosts imitating how, ostensibly, a ghost trapped in a maze and hungry for yellow circular flesh would behave, and how CS1.6 bots imitate the behavior of intelligent players. They artificially reproduce intelligent behavior.
Which means LLMs are very much AI. They are not, however, AGI.