betanumerus
@betanumerus@lemmy.ca
- Comment on Scientific explanation 2 days ago:
“How is a more common problem any helpful?" - I never saw anyone trying to solve for weight so I brought you where most people discussing black holes operate: squeezing mass until it’s a black hole. But you actually wanted weight: feed the cat until it’s planet size. No problem man, you do you. And smiles don’t mean disrespect.
- Comment on Scientific explanation 2 days ago:
A cat of any weight can become a black hole, so I don’t understand what you’re trying to find. What I showed you is a more common problem with a clear solution. If you don’t want communicate then just don’t.
- Comment on Scientific explanation 4 days ago:
I know this is only for fun, but what you have to do is: fix cat weight and calculate cat radius (instead of fixing cat radius and calculating cat weight). 🙂
- Comment on Scientific explanation 4 days ago:
Well anyway, that’s wrong too. Density makes a black hole, not just weight. And you’re on the wrong extreme of density.
- Comment on Scientific explanation 4 days ago:
(no one does … he doesn’t say if that’s a number of ounces or a number of metric tons …)
- Comment on Great to see some actual progress over there 5 days ago:
This is the kind of ridiculousness we see from headlines about djt .
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 5 days ago:
Better than rheumatoid stuff.
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 5 days ago:
3D things have both a volume and an area. Like, how much wrapping paper you need to wrap a gift box.
- Comment on There was no need to ever improve upon THIS 5 days ago:
Name a car without a processor. Year and model.
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 5 days ago:
Cylinder side also non-planar, yet not a problem.
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 5 days ago:
You need the length for each side. Make triangles. Double each one into a parallelogram. bh/2 for each one.
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 5 days ago:
Hard to say if the integral can be solved analytically or not.
- Comment on There was no need to ever improve upon THIS 5 days ago:
The CPU and screen are already in the car for other things. No cost there. And I don’t think you actually know how to make a nob.
- Comment on I'm fine with being stupid 6 days ago:
Volume is also nothing but polygons, where you get more accurate results the more slices you cut it into.
- Comment on Everything has a bit of overlap 6 days ago:
Observing includes watching … and more! lol
- Comment on Everything has a bit of overlap 6 days ago:
“Observe” implies interaction with a photon.
- Comment on Everything has a bit of overlap 1 week ago:
You could keep going but I made my point.
- Comment on There was no need to ever improve upon THIS 1 week ago:
That only depends on what badge they put on the hood.
- Comment on There was no need to ever improve upon THIS 1 week ago:
The screen could well be more expensive than the dial parts, but installation would be cheaper, so we’d need the numbers. The thing about software is that it’s very expensive to make but selling price is as low or high as you need it to be.
- Comment on Everything has a bit of overlap 1 week ago:
Absolutely, especially those electrons in our 5 senses (retina, ear drums, and skin, nose and tongue sensors).
- Comment on There was no need to ever improve upon THIS 1 week ago:
That has 5 moving parts, while a touchscreen has none. It much easier and cheaper for the manufacturer to install the touchscreen. But instead of passing the savings to you, they probably keep it or pass it on to investors.
- Comment on Everything has a bit of overlap 1 week ago:
I would say the overlap is actually complete. It depends on what exactly you mean by “observed”, and “behaving”.
- Comment on #environmentalist 1 week ago:
Bamboo straws make you feel like your on some exotic, tropical island!
- Comment on sagan/sanders 1991 1 week ago:
My point was that Sagan openly taught climate change to Congress 40 years ago, so Congress and Americans have no excuse not to know, not that he was anywhere near being the first to propose it. He was known as a teacher/professor to the masses, much more than as a pioneer like Fourrier or Arrhenius. Topic is Sagan and Congress, not necessarily climate change.
- Comment on sagan/sanders 1991 1 week ago:
“gish-galloping nonsense”- Yes well largely because the O&G produce hire marketing firms to mind people’s minds away from the climate crisis. Advertising at/sponsoring sports like Canadian hockey games is a prime example.
- Comment on sagan/sanders 1991 1 week ago:
Everyone should watch Sagan teaching climate change to Congress back in 1985: youtu.be/Wp-WiNXH6hI
- Comment on Fight me 1 week ago:
People say efficient without saying efficient at doing what with what.
- Comment on AWS crash causes $2,000 Smart Beds to overheat and get stuck upright 1 week ago:
It’s amazing that they actually designed the beds to fail in the worse possible way. I mean this is cartoon crazy.
- Comment on Just answer the question you fuckin' nerd 1 week ago:
Answer: “Your photo has 7 objects, which one are you asking about, you fuckin’ drunk?”
- Comment on Fucking math... 1 week ago:
4 over 100
X over 75
And there’s your butterfly.