weker01

@weker01@feddit.de

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨To all you outside of the US...⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean I wasn’t really serious as we are in a shit post community right now.

  But do you realize how fucking hard it is to keep US politics out of your experience here? So many seemingly unrelated communities post election bullshit it’s not even funny :/

  I do think that the next presidential US election is important not only for Americans but the world. Although it really is tiring to watch from over here and I can only imagine how tired most Americans must be…

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨To all you outside of the US...⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  I would love not knowing about any debate but lemmy is like: Nope you’ll read American “news” if you want to or not.

  So next time keep your national humiliation fetish at private please

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Can't get that metallic taste out of my mouth⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  Don’t discriminate against them milkers!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why do teeth don't regenerate?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  For the record I did not down vote but I can see how people dislike this kind of over enthusiasm for drugs still in trial. Many people got burned before by false hope :(

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon knows what he likes⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m from Germany though. Look at my instance URL.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anon knows what he likes⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Just be careful about food safety. I also like to try local food >.<

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The American People⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The American People?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨hawt⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Nothing at all…

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🔔 SHAME 🔔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  My use of language could very well be incorrect. I am not a native English speaker anyways. That’s no reason to be so condescending.

  I was just merely stating my credentials to have a basis of discussion but you do not seem to be interested in that.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🔔 SHAME 🔔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I know. I’ve studied this extensively. I am specialized in formal logic and by extension set theory. I’ve worked with and help write actual research papers in this field where this is basic knowledge.

  I’ve never claimed their to be a bijection between the reals and the natural numbers. Please point out what statement I made that is wrong. I would very much like to know.

  Also no you do not have to accept choice for this to be true. ZF is perfectly acceptable to study various infinite sets with differing cardinality.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🔔 SHAME 🔔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  That is until you meet analysis people that define a symbol for infinity (and it’s negation) and add it to the real numbers to close the set.

  Also there are applications in computer science where ordering stuff after the first infinite ordinal is important and useful.

  Yea unfortunately we do kinda calculate with infinity as a concrete thing sometimes in higher level maths…

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🔔 SHAME 🔔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  That is the way it is often taught but actually both sets are infinite that is have no ends or in other words are not bounded.

  The thing that is confusing to understand is that the question how many there are and how much there is diverges at infinity.

  Our intuition (as finite beings) is broken here. Both sets are infinite but in one is more than in the other. That does not make one set more infinite than the other. You cannot be more unending than to literally have no end.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🔔 SHAME 🔔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Infinity + infinity = 2 * infinity 3 * infinity … Infinity * infinity = infinity^2 Infinity^3 … Infinity^infinity …

  If infinity is the “first” i.e. Natural infinity than those are all well defined things (Ordinals)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anyone else?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I want to add that an annoying character can act morally totally OK but still be disliked. That is because the annoyance is real and their actions and their consequences are not.

  You could have a saintly character that always does the “right thing” but if they have an obnoxiously annoying way of speaking (extrem high pitch, extremely slow or fast or something) I would still dislike them.

  That is because I actually get annoyed watching the character while I do not react that harshly even to a drug kingpin as the consequences of their action is fictional.

  I have that kind of feeling of annoyance fir skyler. I really do get annoyed at her controlling and arrogant way to handle things as it reminds me of real people. I do believe that this was intentional to make her unlikeable on first glance.

  No matter how moral or “normal” her choices are the consequences are still fictional while my annoyance is real.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Ah, Yes! AI Will Surely Save Us All!⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Internationally? I know that in Germany there are cases.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Ah, Yes! AI Will Surely Save Us All!⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What makes jobs real?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Ah, Yes! AI Will Surely Save Us All!⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Text even completely fictional can be CSAM based on jurisdiction.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨this one goes out to the arts & humanities⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I was just pointing out that your emotional plea, that this technology is just autocorrect is not an argument in any way.

  For it to be one you need to explicitly state the implication of that fact. Yes architecturaly it is autocomplete but that does not obviously imply anything. What is it about autocomplete that barrs a system of the ability to understand?

  Humans are made of meat but that does not imply they can’t speak or think.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨this one goes out to the arts & humanities⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  That is not an argument. Let me demonstrate:

  Humans can’t communicate. They are meat. They are not communicating. It’s literally meat.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨My phone is not for phone calls⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What’s wrong with calls?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨trash⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I like the 2006 one. But I’m biased I had a similar one irl

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨gatekeeping⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No you can have numbers past infinity op is wrong.

  As for how to order past the first infinity it’s easy.

  Of course first you have 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < … Then you take a new number not equal to any of the others let’s call it omega. Define omega to be larger than the others. So 1 < omega, 2 < omega,…

  This you can of course continue even further by introducing omega + 1 which is larger than omega and therefore larger than all natural numbers.

  You can continue this even further by introducing a new number let’s call it lambda that is bigger than all omega + x where x is a natural number.

  This can be continued forever i.e. an infinite amount of times.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨gatekeeping⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No cardinal and ordinal numbers continue past the “first” infinity in modern math. I.e. The cardinal number denoting the cardinality of the natural numbers (aleph_0) is smaller than the one of the reals.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨1.1 History⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You should try discussing instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks.

  Frankly you never stated how the behavior of Islam (that is also a monotheistic religion that denies all other gods) fits with the idea that antitheism is colonial white people stuff.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨1.1 History⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No they don’t claim antitheism is colonial white people stuff.

  First your own cited sources contradict you: you said that ancient Christians beliefed also in other gods but ancient Judaism was before that. Also in those sources you find that this happend in ancient Israel.

  I don’t think the people there would be described as white.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨1.1 History⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  How does Islam fit into your frankly absurd worldview?