strassen's algorithm kinda hot tho

Comments

• hamsamrich@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Please tag NSFW

  source
• arudesalad@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I can do matrix multiplication and draw pictures badly so what is even the point of ai

  source

  • krakloskewm@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    So you dont have to

    source
• Zachariah@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  with some tidy cable management, that’s marriage material right there

  source

  • MrSmith@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fuck, I read that as “tiddy”.

    source
• pseudo@jlai.lu ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I much more likly to fall for it if you present it this way. Isn’t that muxh more attractive that the possibility to be buttered up by a computer and sexting it?

  source
• pleiades@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Linear Algebra is pretty hot though

  source
• halfapage@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Any intelligent system that exists within our physical universe is going to ultimately be some material object that behaves in a manner that can be described with math, but that does not mean that any math that can be used to create human-readable text represents a humanlike intelligence, its gotta be the right kinds of math to get the specific set of emergent properties that result in our consciousness, and when we dont even entirely understand how it all works and what all you need for it in humans, replicating our internal experience at this point in time would require our attempted approximations to hit upon all the right answers for it more or less by accident, which seems unlikely. (I know you were being sarcastic but on the surface “brains are also just thing doing stuff” isnt an absurd response to this kind of meme so I thought it could use a reply anyway.)

    source

    • paranoia@feddit.dk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The problem is that we cannot actually define sentience/consciousness either though, and it is likely the human brain is not the most efficient way to achieve it.

      For me the question is more around the theoretical minimum for consciousness and how close we are to that.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • ElGrande@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I’m not reading all that, bro.

      Would though.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Well of course LLMs aren’t near-human in intelligence. But they do work in a similar way to the human brain’s Wernicke’s area. Thus, dating an LLM is bestiality.

      source
    • Toes@ani.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I really wonder if (or when) we’ll have enough compute to simulate the human brain at the subatomic level flawlessly. And if that is sentient life?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I mean, it is mostly how they work, just less grey matter. And no ability for independent growth…

    source
• zaphod@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  People say they don’t like maths and then fall in love with an LLM.

  source
• Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  So hot, please tag NSFW

  source
• spacegoat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’ll follow up when the Lucy Liu android model is available

  source
• praveen@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  by that logic you’re in love with atoms and molecules

  source
• Gaja0@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  😍🥴

  source
• Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  So hard

  source
• RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  She can’t even hug you bro

  source

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can hug your children with ai equipped nuclear arms.

    source